Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] make hugetlb put_page safe for all calling contexts

From: Mike Kravetz
Date: Fri Apr 09 2021 - 16:44:49 EST


On 4/8/21 10:05 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 09:11:30 +0200 Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> But if It is going to be easier for Andrew, just pull them all out and I
>> will resend the whole series once this work goes in.
>
> I think so.
>
> I shall drop these:
>
> mmpage_alloc-bail-out-earlier-on-enomem-in-alloc_contig_migrate_range.patch
> mmcompaction-let-isolate_migratepages_rangeblock-return-error-codes.patch
> mmcompaction-let-isolate_migratepages_rangeblock-return-error-codes-fix.patch
> mm-make-alloc_contig_range-handle-free-hugetlb-pages.patch
> mm-make-alloc_contig_range-handle-in-use-hugetlb-pages.patch
> mmpage_alloc-drop-unnecessary-checks-from-pfn_range_valid_contig.patch
>
> and these:
>
> mm-cma-change-cma-mutex-to-irq-safe-spinlock.patch
> hugetlb-no-need-to-drop-hugetlb_lock-to-call-cma_release.patch
> hugetlb-add-per-hstate-mutex-to-synchronize-user-adjustments.patch
> hugetlb-create-remove_hugetlb_page-to-separate-functionality.patch
> hugetlb-call-update_and_free_page-without-hugetlb_lock.patch
> hugetlb-change-free_pool_huge_page-to-remove_pool_huge_page.patch
> hugetlb-make-free_huge_page-irq-safe.patch
> hugetlb-make-free_huge_page-irq-safe-fix.patch
> hugetlb-add-lockdep_assert_held-calls-for-hugetlb_lock.patch
>
> Along with notes-to-self that this:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YGwnPCPaq1xKh/88@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> might need attention and that this:
>
> hugetlb-make-free_huge_page-irq-safe.patch
>
> might need updating.
>

Thank you Andrew!

I will send a v5 shortly based on dropping the above patch.

--
Mike Kravetz