Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add support for XMM fast hypercalls

[Vitaly Kuznetsov]

Siddharth Chandrasekaran <sidcha@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 04:30:18PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 05:54:43PM +0200, Siddharth Chandrasekaran wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > > On 08/04/21 17:40, Siddharth Chandrasekaran wrote:
>> > > > > > > Although the Hyper-v TLFS mentions that a guest cannot use this feature
>> > > > > > > unless the hypervisor advertises support for it, some hypercalls which
>> > > > > > > we plan on upstreaming in future uses them anyway.
>> > > > > > No, please don't do this. Check the feature bit(s) before you issue
>> > > > > > hypercalls which rely on the extended interface.
>> > > > > Perhaps Siddharth should clarify this, but I read it as Hyper-V being
>> > > > > buggy and using XMM arguments unconditionally.
>> > > > The guest is at fault here as it expects Hyper-V to consume arguments
>> > > > from XMM registers for certain hypercalls (that we are working) even if
>> > > > we didn't expose the feature via CPUID bits.
>> > >
>> > > What guest is that?
>> >
>> > It is a Windows Server 2016.
>> 
>> Can you be more specific? Are you implementing some hypercalls from
>> TLFS? If so, which ones?
>
> Yes all of them are from TLFS. We are implementing VSM and there are a
> bunch of hypercalls that we have implemented to manage VTL switches,
> memory protection and virtual interrupts.

Wow, sounds awesome! Do you plan to upstream this work?

> The following 3 hypercalls that use the XMM fast hypercalls are relevant
> to this patch set:
>
> HvCallModifyVtlProtectionMask
> HvGetVpRegisters 
> HvSetVpRegisters 

It seems AccessVSM and AccessVpRegisters privilges have implicit
dependency on XMM input/output. This will need to be enforced in KVM
userspace.

-- 
Vitaly