Re: [Bug 212265] New: clock_gettime(CLOCK_TAI, ...) should return an error when TAI has not been configured

[Richard Cochran]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:16:48AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> There are at least two issues with handling a zero offset as a special
> value. One is that zero could potentially be a valid value in distant
> future.

I not losing sleep over that, but

> The other is that the kernel updates the offset when a leap
> second is inserted/deleted even if the original offset is zero, so
> checking for zero (in the kernel or an application) works only until
> the first leap second after boot.

oh, I didn't think of that.  I hate leap seconds.  Good thing Earth is
picking up the pace again!
 
> The kernel would need to set a flag that the offset was set. Returning
> an error in clock_gettime() until the offset is set sounds reasonable
> to me, but I have no idea how many of the existing applications it
> would break.

I think it wiser to provide another way, sysfs or something else.

Thanks,
Richard