Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] usb: gadget: pch_udc: Drop unneeded cpu_to_le32() call

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Tue Mar 23 2021 - 08:25:01 EST


On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:11:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Either way ~0 will be in the correct byte order,
> > hence drop unneeded cpu_to_le32() call. Moreover,
> > it makes sparse happy, otherwise it complains:
> >
> > pch_udc.c:1813:27: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
> > pch_udc.c:1813:27: expected unsigned int [usertype] dataptr
> > pch_udc.c:1813:27: got restricted __le32 [usertype]
> >
> > Fixes: f646cf94520e ("USB device driver of Topcliff PCH")
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
> > index a3c1fc924268..2e2dca391007 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
> > @@ -1756,7 +1756,7 @@ static struct usb_request *pch_udc_alloc_request(struct usb_ep *usbep,
> > }
> > /* prevent from using desc. - set HOST BUSY */
> > dma_desc->status |= PCH_UDC_BS_HST_BSY;
> > - dma_desc->dataptr = cpu_to_le32(DMA_ADDR_INVALID);
> > + dma_desc->dataptr = DMA_ADDR_INVALID;
> > req->td_data = dma_desc;
> > req->td_data_last = dma_desc;
> > req->chain_len = 1;
>
> With this series applied, I get the following build warning:
>
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c: In function ‘pch_udc_alloc_request’:
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c:208:26: warning: conversion from ‘long long unsigned int’ to ‘u32’ {aka ‘unsigned int’} changes value from ‘18446744073709551615’ to ‘4294967295’ [-Woverflow]
> 208 | #define DMA_ADDR_INVALID (~(dma_addr_t)0)
> | ^
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c:1813:22: note: in expansion of macro ‘DMA_ADDR_INVALID’
> 1813 | dma_desc->dataptr = DMA_ADDR_INVALID;
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> Please fix up and resend a new version of this series.

Oops, thanks! Now I understand how I missed this (I have another patch to test
that effectively removed that line AFAIR. In any case, I will retest and
resend.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko