Re: [PATCH next v1 2/3] printk: remove safe buffers

[John Ogness]

On 2021-03-21, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> @@ -369,7 +70,10 @@ __printf(1, 0) int vprintk_func(const char *fmt, va_list args)
>>  	 * Use the main logbuf even in NMI. But avoid calling console
>>  	 * drivers that might have their own locks.
>>  	 */
>> -	if ((this_cpu_read(printk_context) & PRINTK_NMI_DIRECT_CONTEXT_MASK)) {
>> +	if (this_cpu_read(printk_context) &
>> +	    (PRINTK_NMI_DIRECT_CONTEXT_MASK |
>> +	     PRINTK_NMI_CONTEXT_MASK |
>> +	     PRINTK_SAFE_CONTEXT_MASK)) {
>
> Do we need printk_nmi_direct_enter/exit() and
> PRINTK_NMI_DIRECT_CONTEXT_MASK?  Seems like all printk_safe() paths
> are now DIRECT - we store messages to the prb, but don't call console
> drivers.

I was planning on waiting until the kthreads are introduced, in which
case printk_safe.c is completely removed. But I suppose I could switch
the 1 printk_nmi_direct_enter() user to printk_nmi_enter() so that
PRINTK_NMI_DIRECT_CONTEXT_MASK can be removed now. I would do this in a
4th patch of the series.

John Ogness