Re: [PATCH] dt: rockchip: rk3399: Add dynamic power coefficient for GPU
From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Fri Mar 19 2021 - 10:36:25 EST
Hi Robin,
On 19/03/2021 13:17, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2021-03-19 11:05, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The DTPM framework is looking for upstream SoC candidates to share the
>> power numbers.
>>
>> We can see around different numbers but the one which seems to be
>> consistent with the initial post for the values on the CPUs can be
>> found in the patch https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/810159/
>
> The kernel hacker in me would be more inclined to trust the BSP that the
> vendor actively supports than a 5-year-old patch that was never pursued
> upstream. Apparently that was last updated more recently:
>
> https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/commit/98d4505e1bd62ff028bd79fbd8284d64b6f468f8
Yes, I've seen this value also.
> The ex-mathematician in me can't even comment either way without
> evidence that whatever model expects to consume this value is even
> comparable to whatever "arm,mali-simple-power-model" is. >
> The way the
> latter apparently needs an explicit "static" coefficient as well as a
> "dynamic" one, and the value here being nearly 3 times that of a
> similarly-named one in active use downstream (ChromeOS appears to still
> be using the values from before the above commit), certainly incline me
> to think they may not be...
Sorry, I'm missing the point :/
We dropped in the kernel any static power computation because as there
was no value, the resulting code was considered dead. So we rely on the
dynamic power only.
>> I don't know the precision of this value but it is better than
>> nothing.
>
> But is it? If it leads to some throttling mechanism kicking in and
> crippling GPU performance because it's massively overestimating power
> consumption, that would be objectively worse for most users, no?
No because there is no sustainable power specified for the thermal zones
related to the GPU.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog