Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: use wake_up_process() instead of wake_up_state()

[Christian König]

Am 19.03.21 um 03:58 schrieb Wang Qing:
> Using wake_up_process() is more simpler and friendly,
> and it is more convenient for analysis and statistics
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>

Should I pick it up or do you want to push it through some other tree 
than DRM?

Thanks,
Christian.

> ---
>   drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> index 7475e09..de51326
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ dma_fence_default_wait_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
>   	struct default_wait_cb *wait =
>   		container_of(cb, struct default_wait_cb, base);
>   
> -	wake_up_state(wait->task, TASK_NORMAL);
> +	wake_up_process(wait->task);
>   }
>   
>   /**