Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: qcom: tsens-v0_1: Add support for MDM9607

From: Thara Gopinath
Date: Wed Mar 17 2021 - 18:39:35 EST




On 2/9/21 2:25 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
MDM9607 TSENS IP is very similar to the one of MSM8916, with
minor adjustments to various tuning values.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>

---
Changes since v2:
- Address Bjorn's comments (remove redundant variable and kfree)
.../bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml | 2 +
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 3 +
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
index 95462e071ab4..8ad9dc139c23 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ properties:
- description: v0.1 of TSENS
items:
- enum:
+ - qcom,mdm9607-tsens
- qcom,msm8916-tsens
- qcom,msm8939-tsens
- qcom,msm8974-tsens
@@ -94,6 +95,7 @@ allOf:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
+ - qcom,mdm9607-tsens

This should be split into two different patches. DT binding changes is usually not combined with driver changes because two different maintainers handle them. Also checkpatch.pl throws a warning stating the same.

- qcom,msm8916-tsens
- qcom,msm8974-tsens
- qcom,msm8976-tsens
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c
index 4ffa2e2c0145..a9fc92a4779b 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c
@@ -190,6 +190,39 @@
#define BIT_APPEND 0x3
+/* eeprom layout data for mdm9607 */
+#define MDM9607_BASE0_MASK 0x000000ff
+#define MDM9607_BASE1_MASK 0x000ff000
+#define MDM9607_BASE0_SHIFT 0
+#define MDM9607_BASE1_SHIFT 12
+
+#define MDM9607_S0_P1_MASK 0x00003f00
+#define MDM9607_S1_P1_MASK 0x03f00000
+#define MDM9607_S2_P1_MASK 0x0000003f
+#define MDM9607_S3_P1_MASK 0x0003f000
+#define MDM9607_S4_P1_MASK 0x0000003f
+
+#define MDM9607_S0_P2_MASK 0x000fc000
+#define MDM9607_S1_P2_MASK 0xfc000000
+#define MDM9607_S2_P2_MASK 0x00000fc0
+#define MDM9607_S3_P2_MASK 0x00fc0000
+#define MDM9607_S4_P2_MASK 0x00000fc0
+
+#define MDM9607_S0_P1_SHIFT 8
+#define MDM9607_S1_P1_SHIFT 20
+#define MDM9607_S2_P1_SHIFT 0
+#define MDM9607_S3_P1_SHIFT 12
+#define MDM9607_S4_P1_SHIFT 0
+
+#define MDM9607_S0_P2_SHIFT 14
+#define MDM9607_S1_P2_SHIFT 26
+#define MDM9607_S2_P2_SHIFT 6
+#define MDM9607_S3_P2_SHIFT 18
+#define MDM9607_S4_P2_SHIFT 6
+
+#define MDM9607_CAL_SEL_MASK 0x00700000
+#define MDM9607_CAL_SEL_SHIFT 20
+
static int calibrate_8916(struct tsens_priv *priv)
{
int base0 = 0, base1 = 0, i;
@@ -452,7 +485,56 @@ static int calibrate_8974(struct tsens_priv *priv)
return 0;
}
-/* v0.1: 8916, 8939, 8974 */
+static int calibrate_9607(struct tsens_priv *priv)
+{
+ int base, i;
+ u32 p1[5], p2[5];
+ int mode = 0;
+ u32 *qfprom_cdata;
+
+ qfprom_cdata = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib");
+ if (IS_ERR(qfprom_cdata))
+ return PTR_ERR(qfprom_cdata);
+
+ mode = (qfprom_cdata[2] & MDM9607_CAL_SEL_MASK) >> MDM9607_CAL_SEL_SHIFT;
+ dev_dbg(priv->dev, "calibration mode is %d\n", mode);
+
+ switch (mode) {
+ case TWO_PT_CALIB:
+ base = (qfprom_cdata[2] & MDM9607_BASE1_MASK) >> MDM9607_BASE1_SHIFT;
+ p2[0] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MDM9607_S0_P2_MASK) >> MDM9607_S0_P2_SHIFT;
+ p2[1] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MDM9607_S1_P2_MASK) >> MDM9607_S1_P2_SHIFT;
+ p2[2] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MDM9607_S2_P2_MASK) >> MDM9607_S2_P2_SHIFT;
+ p2[3] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MDM9607_S3_P2_MASK) >> MDM9607_S3_P2_SHIFT;
+ p2[4] = (qfprom_cdata[2] & MDM9607_S4_P2_MASK) >> MDM9607_S4_P2_SHIFT;
+ for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++)
+ p2[i] = ((base + p2[i]) << 2);
+ fallthrough;
+ case ONE_PT_CALIB2:
+ base = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MDM9607_BASE0_MASK);
+ p1[0] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MDM9607_S0_P1_MASK) >> MDM9607_S0_P1_SHIFT;
+ p1[1] = (qfprom_cdata[0] & MDM9607_S1_P1_MASK) >> MDM9607_S1_P1_SHIFT;
+ p1[2] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MDM9607_S2_P1_MASK) >> MDM9607_S2_P1_SHIFT;
+ p1[3] = (qfprom_cdata[1] & MDM9607_S3_P1_MASK) >> MDM9607_S3_P1_SHIFT;
+ p1[4] = (qfprom_cdata[2] & MDM9607_S4_P1_MASK) >> MDM9607_S4_P1_SHIFT;
+ for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++)
+ p1[i] = (((base) + p1[i]) << 2);

minor nit: extra braces around base

+ break;
+ default:
+ for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) {
+ p1[i] = 500;
+ p2[i] = 780;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+
+ compute_intercept_slope(priv, p1, p2, mode);
+ kfree(qfprom_cdata);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* v0.1: 8916, 8939, 8974, 9607 */
static struct tsens_features tsens_v0_1_feat = {
.ver_major = VER_0_1,
@@ -540,3 +622,18 @@ struct tsens_plat_data data_8974 = {
.feat = &tsens_v0_1_feat,
.fields = tsens_v0_1_regfields,
};
+
+static const struct tsens_ops ops_9607 = {
+ .init = init_common,
+ .calibrate = calibrate_9607,
+ .get_temp = get_temp_common,
+};
+
+struct tsens_plat_data data_9607 = {
+ .num_sensors = 5,
+ .ops = &ops_9607,
+ .hw_ids = (unsigned int []){ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 },
+

please remove the stray blank line.

--
Warm Regards
Thara