Re: [PATCH v2] smp: kernel/panic.c - silence warnings

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Now, the C people figured that distinction was useless and allowed 
> sloppiness. But I still think there's merrit to that. And as 
> mentioned earlier, it is consistent with variable declarations.

Fully agreed, and my other point was that it's also consistent with 
the other existing externs were used *in the same header file* 
already.

I.e. there's nothing more sloppy than mixing different styles within 
the same header. Checkpatch needs to be fixed or ignored here.

Thanks,

	Ingo