Re: [PATCH 7/7] net: page_pool: use alloc_pages_bulk in refill code path

From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Date: Mon Mar 15 2021 - 04:41:40 EST


On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:30:58 +0000
Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:44:09AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > - /* FUTURE development:
> > > - *
> > > - * Current slow-path essentially falls back to single page
> > > - * allocations, which doesn't improve performance. This code
> > > - * need bulk allocation support from the page allocator code.
> > > - */
> > > -
> > > - /* Cache was empty, do real allocation */
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> > > - page = alloc_pages_node(pool->p.nid, gfp, pool->p.order);
> > > -#else
> > > - page = alloc_pages(gfp, pool->p.order);
> > > -#endif
> > > - if (!page)
> > > + if (unlikely(!__alloc_pages_bulk(gfp, pp_nid, NULL, bulk, &page_list)))
> > > return NULL;
> > >
> > > + /* First page is extracted and returned to caller */
> > > + first_page = list_first_entry(&page_list, struct page, lru);
> > > + list_del(&first_page->lru);
> > > +
> >
> > This seems kind of broken to me. If you pull the first page and then
> > cannot map it you end up returning NULL even if you placed a number of
> > pages in the cache.
> >
>
> I think you're right but I'm punting this to Jesper to fix. He's more
> familiar with this particular code and can verify the performance is
> still ok for high speed networks.

Yes, I'll take a look at this, and updated the patch accordingly (and re-run
the performance tests).

--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer