Re: [PATCH 1/2] ata: delete redundant printing of return value

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello again. :-)

   Now, 2 patches to the different files shouldn't have and identical subject! And the patch
subject should reflect the exact patch locus, e.g. "sata_highbank: delete redundant printing
of return value".

On 3/13/21 10:47 AM, Wang Qing wrote:

> platform_get_irq() has already checked and printed the return value, 
> the printing here is nothing special, it is not necessary at all.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c b/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c
> index 64b2ef1..a43d42a
> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c
> @@ -469,10 +469,8 @@ static int ahci_highbank_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> -	if (irq <= 0) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "no irq\n");
> +	if (irq <= 0)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	}

   Again, this code has more serious issue: it breaks deferred probing by 
overriding the result to -EINVAL...

MBR, Sergei