Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Rudimentary typos fix in the file s5pv210-cpufreq.c

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Fri Mar 12 2021 - 18:53:42 EST


On 3/12/21 3:38 PM, Tom Saeger wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 04:46:20AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>> On 15:01 Fri 12 Mar 2021, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 12/03/2021 13:08, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>>>>
>>>> s/untile/until/
>>>> s/souce/source/
>>>> s/divier/divider/
>>>>

>
> May as well roll in few more?
>
> Regards,
>
> --Tom
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
> index a186c0d8a290..6ecef301bd40 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(set_freq_lock);
> /* Use 800MHz when entering sleep mode */
> #define SLEEP_FREQ (800 * 1000)
>
> -/* Tracks if cpu freqency can be updated anymore */
> +/* Tracks if cpu frequency can be updated anymore */
> static bool no_cpufreq_access;
>
> /*
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static u32 clkdiv_val[5][11] = {
>
> /*
> * This function set DRAM refresh counter
> - * accoriding to operating frequency of DRAM
> + * according to operating frequency of DRAM
> * ch: DMC port number 0 or 1
> * freq: Operating frequency of DRAM(KHz)
> */
> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
>
> /*
> * 3. DMC1 refresh count for 133Mhz if (index == L4) is
> - * true refresh counter is already programed in upper
> + * true refresh counter is already programmed in upper
> * code. 0x287@83Mhz
> */
> if (!bus_speed_changing)
>

LGTM.
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

--
~Randy