Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm/hugetlb: avoid calculating fault_mutex_hash in truncate_op case

[Mike Kravetz]

On 3/8/21 3:28 AM, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> The fault_mutex hashing overhead can be avoided in truncate_op case because
> page faults can not race with truncation in this routine. So calculate hash
> for fault_mutex only in !truncate_op case to save some cpu cycles.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> index c262566f7c5d..d81f52b87bd7 100644
> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> @@ -482,10 +482,9 @@ static void remove_inode_hugepages(struct inode *inode, loff_t lstart,
>  
>  		for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(&pvec); ++i) {
>  			struct page *page = pvec.pages[i];
> -			u32 hash;
> +			u32 hash = 0;

Do we need to initialize hash here?
I would not bring this up normally, but the purpose of the patch is to save
cpu cycles.
-- 
Mike Kravetz

>  
>  			index = page->index;
> -			hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, index);
>  			if (!truncate_op) {
>  				/*
>  				 * Only need to hold the fault mutex in the
> @@ -493,6 +492,7 @@ static void remove_inode_hugepages(struct inode *inode, loff_t lstart,
>  				 * page faults.  Races are not possible in the
>  				 * case of truncation.
>  				 */
> +				hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, index);
>  				mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
>  			}
>  
>