Re: [PATCH 00/10] spi: finalize 'delay_usecs' removal/transition

From: Mark Brown
Date: Fri Mar 12 2021 - 15:27:41 EST


On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:54:52 +0200, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> A while back I started the introduction of the 'spi_delay' data type:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/20190926105147.7839-1-alexandru.ardelean@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Users of the 'delay_usecs' were removed from drivers.
>
> Now it's time to remove the 'delay_usecs' from the SPI subsystem and use
> only the 'delay' field.
>
> [...]

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[01/10] spi: spi-axi-spi-engine: remove usage of delay_usecs
commit: 93c941448994a728e691f7dce9ea6475e352b09c
[02/10] spi: bcm63xx-spi: don't check 'delay_usecs' field
commit: e7f2d4c6aacd0a2cded363bb14ef9b6e752798fd
[03/10] spi: spi-bcm-qspi: replace 'delay_usecs' with 'delay.value' check
commit: 66a3aadec42aa001c62ae9a637398d853880a02b
[04/10] spi: spi-sh: replace 'delay_usecs' with 'delay.value' in pr_debug
commit: 506d1a1b441e058e318d8d81141295ff76927367
[05/10] spi: spi-tegra20-flash: don't check 'delay_usecs' field for spi transfer
commit: 7ca660f8212b2fbeb0f3133c3a6fa8805777a877
[06/10] staging: greybus: spilib: use 'spi_delay_to_ns' for getting xfer delay
commit: 33a23423ca0a08b488791fc9d4ca53f4bea4e45b
[07/10] spi: spi-falcon: remove check for 'delay_usecs'
commit: a886010c69718988756fd7873522caa0f26af398
[08/10] spi: fsl-espi: remove usage of 'delay_usecs' field
commit: 55a47532fa4c5dc3291d796dd21cc80034b5d067
[09/10] spi: core: remove 'delay_usecs' field from spi_transfer
commit: 3ab1cce553378fc0df1b1d26d7e23d03bd4dd3b6
[10/10] spi: docs: update info about 'delay_usecs'
commit: 05d8a019eb057d14cdf9483318a7ee8b35a69cda

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark