Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: dec: tulip: Random spelling fixes throughout the file pnic2.c

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Fri Mar 12 2021 - 02:24:26 EST


On 3/11/21 11:05 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>
> Random spelling fixes throughout the file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/pnic2.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/pnic2.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/pnic2.c
> index 412adaa7fdf8..04daffb8db2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/pnic2.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/pnic2.c
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ void pnic2_start_nway(struct net_device *dev)
> */
> csr14 = (ioread32(ioaddr + CSR14) & 0xfff0ee39);
>
> - /* bit 17 - advetise 100baseTx-FD */
> + /* bit 17 - advertise 100baseTx-FD */

OK above. But:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonegotiation

> if (tp->sym_advertise & 0x0100) csr14 |= 0x00020000;
>
> /* bit 16 - advertise 100baseTx-HD */
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ void pnic2_start_nway(struct net_device *dev)
> /* bit 6 - advertise 10baseT-HD */
> if (tp->sym_advertise & 0x0020) csr14 |= 0x00000040;
>
> - /* Now set bit 12 Link Test Enable, Bit 7 Autonegotiation Enable
> + /* Now set bit 12 Link Test Enable, Bit 7 Auto negotiation Enable
> * and bit 0 Don't PowerDown 10baseT
> */
> csr14 |= 0x00001184;
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ void pnic2_start_nway(struct net_device *dev)
> /* all set up so now force the negotiation to begin */
>
> /* read in current values and mask off all but the
> - * Autonegotiation bits 14:12. Writing a 001 to those bits
> + * Auto negotiation bits 14:12. Writing a 001 to those bits
> * should start the autonegotiation
> */
> csr12 = (ioread32(ioaddr + CSR12) & 0xffff8fff);
> @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ void pnic2_lnk_change(struct net_device *dev, int csr5)
> csr14 = (ioread32(ioaddr + CSR14) & 0xffffff7f);
> iowrite32(csr14,ioaddr + CSR14);
>
> - /* what should we do when autonegotiate fails?
> + /* what should we do when auto negotiate fails?
> * should we try again or default to baseline
> * case. I just don't know.
> *
> --


--
~Randy