Re: [RFC v2 3/5] arm64: socfpga: rename ARCH_STRATIX10 to ARCH_SOCFPGA64

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 10/03/2021 15:45, Tom Rix wrote:
> 
> On 3/10/21 1:45 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>>> Prepare for merging Stratix 10, Agilex and N5X into one arm64
>>> architecture by first renaming the ARCH_STRATIX10 into ARCH_SOCFPGA64.
>>>
>>> The existing ARCH_SOCFPGA (in ARMv7) Kconfig symbol cannot be used
>>> because altera_edac driver builds differently between them (with
>>> ifdefs).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms                |  7 ++++---
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/Makefile         |  2 +-
>>>  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig                |  2 +-
>>>  drivers/clk/Makefile                        |  2 +-
>>>  drivers/clk/socfpga/Kconfig                 |  4 ++--
>>>  drivers/edac/Kconfig                        |  2 +-
>>>  drivers/edac/altera_edac.c                  | 10 +++++-----
>>>  drivers/firmware/Kconfig                    |  2 +-
>>>  drivers/fpga/Kconfig                        |  2 +-
>>>  drivers/mfd/Kconfig                         |  2 +-
>> If it's okay with everyone else, it'll be okay with me:
>>
>> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I think the name is too broad, from the description in the config
> 
> +	bool "Intel's SoCFPGA ARMv8 Families"
> 
> A better name would be ARCH_INTEL_SOCFPGA64
> 
> So other vendors like Xilinx could do their own thing.

Many other architectures do not have vendor prefix (TEGRA, EXYNOS,
ZYNQMP etc). I would call it the same as in ARMv7 - ARCH_SOCFPGA - but
the Altera EDAC driver depends on these symbols to be different.
Anyway, I don't mind using something else for the name.

Best regards,
Krzysztof