Re: The killing of ideal_nops[]

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:22:48 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> After this FEATURE_NOPL is unused except for required-features for
> x86_64. FEATURE_K8 is only used for PTI and FEATURE_K7 is unused.
> 
> AFAICT this negatively affects lots of 32bit (DONTCARE) and 32bit on
> 64bit CPUs (CARELESS) and early AMD (K8) which is from 2003 and almost
> 2 decades old by now (SHRUG).
> 
> Everything x86_64 since AMD K10 (2007) was using p6_nops.
> 
> And per FEATURE_NOPL being required for x86_64, all those CPUs can use
> p6_nops. So stop caring about NOPs, simplify things and get on with life
> :-)

Before ripping out all the ideal_nop logic, I wonder if we should just
force the nops you want now (that is, don't change the selected
ideal_nops, just "pretend" that the CPU wants p6_nops), and see if anyone
complains. After a few releases, if there's no complaints, then we can
rip out the ideal_nop logic.

-- Steve