Re: [PATCH 5/5] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Scale the power with the load

From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Tue Mar 09 2021 - 14:04:46 EST



Hi Lukasz,

thanks for your comments, one question below.

On 09/03/2021 11:01, Lukasz Luba wrote:

[ ... ]

>>   +static u64 scale_pd_power_uw(struct cpumask *cpus, u64 power)
>
> renamed 'cpus' into 'pd_mask', see below
>
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long max, util;
>> +    int cpu, load = 0;
>
> IMHO 'int load' looks odd when used with 'util' and 'max'.
> I would put in the line above to have them all the same type and
> renamed to 'sum_util'.
>
>> +
>> +    for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
>
> I would avoid the temporary CPU mask in the get_pd_power_uw()
> with this modified loop:
>
> for_each_cpu_and(cpu, pd_mask, cpu_online_mask) {
>
>
>> +        max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
>> +        util = sched_cpu_util(cpu, max);
>> +        load += ((util * 100) / max);
>
> Below you can find 3 optimizations. Since we are not in the hot
> path here, it's up to if you would like to use all/some of them
> or just ignore.
>
> 1st optimization.
> If we use 'load += (util << 10) / max' in the loop, then
> we could avoid div by 100 and use a right shift:
> (power * load) >> 10
>
> 2nd optimization.
> Since we use EM CPU mask, which span all CPUs with the same
> arch_scale_cpu_capacity(), you can avoid N divs inside the loop
> and do it once, below the loop.
>
> 3rd optimization.
> If we just simply add all 'util' into 'sum_util' (no mul or div in
> the loop), then we might just have simple macro
>
> #define CALC_POWER_USAGE(power, sum_util, max) \
>     (((power * (sum_util << 10)) / max) >> 10)

I don't understand the 'max' division, I was expecting here something
like: ((sum_util << 10) / sum_max) >> 10)

no ?




--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog