Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] x86/vmemmap: Handle unpopulated sub-pmd ranges

[Dave Hansen]

On 3/9/21 12:25 AM, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> 
> I think the confusion comes from the name.
> "vmemmap_pmd_is_unused" might be a better fit?
> 
> What do you think? Do you feel strong about moving the log in there
> regardless of the name?

No, not really.  The name is probably worth adjusting, but I think the
code can probably stay put.