Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: misc: add binding for generic ripple counter

[Rasmus Villemoes]

On 08/03/2021 18.21, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 03:14:10PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> While a ripple counter can not usually be interfaced with (directly)
>> from software, it may still be a crucial component in a board
>> layout. To prevent its input clock from being disabled by the clock
>> core because it apparently has no consumer, one needs to be able to
>> represent that consumer in DT.
> 
> I'm okay with this as it is describing h/w, but we already 
> 'protected-clocks' property which should work.

Hm. Unless
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200903040015.5627-2-samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
gets merged, I don't see how this would work out-of-the-box.

Note that I sent a completely different v2, which made the gpio-wdt the
clock consumer based on feedback from Guenter and Arnd, but that v2
isn't suitable for our case because it post-poned handling of the
watchdog till after i2c is ready, which is too late. Somewhat similar to
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210222171247.97609-2-sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
it seems.

>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: Must be "linux,ripple-ctr".
> 
> Nothing linux specific about this.

True, but I was following the lead of the existing gpio-wdt binding. Is
there some other "vendor" name one can and should use for completely
generic and simple components like these? "generic"?

Rasmus