Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] gpiolib: switch to fwnode in the core

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:23 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 7:22 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:13 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > GPIO library uses of_node and fwnode in the core in non-unified way.
> > > The series cleans this up and improves IRQ domain creation for non-OF cases
> > > where currently the names of the domain are 'unknown'.
> > >
> > > This has been tested on Intel Galileo Gen 2.
> > >
> > > In v3:
> > > - fix subtle bug in gpiod_count
> > > - make irq_domain_add_simple() static inline (Marc)
> > >
> > > In v2:
> > > - added a new patch due to functionality in irq_comain_add_simple() (Linus)
> > > - tagged patches 2-4 (Linus)
> > > - Cc'ed to Rafael
> > >
> > > Andy Shevchenko (5):
> > >   irqdomain: Introduce irq_domain_create_simple() API
> > >   gpiolib: Unify the checks on fwnode type
> > >   gpiolib: Move of_node operations to gpiolib-of and correct fwnode use
> > >   gpiolib: Introduce acpi_gpio_dev_init() and call it from core
> > >   gpiolib: Reuse device's fwnode to create IRQ domain
> >
> > [1-4/5] applied as 5.13 material and I have a minor comment regarding
> > the last patch (will send separately).
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> Hi Rafael!
>
> AFAICT this should go through the GPIO tree as usual. Any reason for
> you to pick these patches this time?

My impression was that Andy wanted me to take them.

However, if you'd rather take care of them yourself, there you go!

I'll drop them now and assume that they will be routed through the GPIO tree.

Thanks!