Re: [PATCH v4 07/10] coresight: etm4x: Add complex configuration handlers to etmv4

From: Suzuki K Poulose
Date: Fri Mar 05 2021 - 05:19:00 EST


On 1/28/21 5:09 PM, Mike Leach wrote:
Adds in handlers to allow the ETMv4 to use the complex configuration
support. Features and configurations can be loaded and selected in the
device.

Signed-off-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile | 3 +-
.../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.c | 184 ++++++++++++++++++
.../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.h | 29 +++
.../coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c | 38 +++-
.../coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c | 3 +
5 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.c
create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.h

diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
index daad9f103a78..ea544206204d 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_SOURCE_ETM3X) += coresight-etm3x.o
coresight-etm3x-y := coresight-etm3x-core.o coresight-etm-cp14.o \
coresight-etm3x-sysfs.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_SOURCE_ETM4X) += coresight-etm4x.o
-coresight-etm4x-y := coresight-etm4x-core.o coresight-etm4x-sysfs.o
+coresight-etm4x-y := coresight-etm4x-core.o coresight-etm4x-sysfs.o \
+ coresight-etm4x-cfg.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_STM) += coresight-stm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_CPU_DEBUG) += coresight-cpu-debug.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_CATU) += coresight-catu.o
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f237a8d02360
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.c
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright(C) 2020 Linaro Limited. All rights reserved.
+ * Author: Mike Leach <mike.leach@xxxxxxxxxx>
+ */
+
+#include "coresight-etm4x.h"
+#include "coresight-etm4x-cfg.h"
+#include "coresight-priv.h"
+#include "coresight-syscfg.h"
+
+/**
+ * etm4_cfg_map_reg_offset - validate and map the register offset into a
+ * location in the driver config struct.
+ *
+ * Limits the number of registers that can be accessed and programmed in
+ * features, to those which are used to control the trace capture parameters.
+ *
+ * Omits or limits access to those which the driver must use exclusively.
+ *
+ * Invalid offsets will result in fail code return and feature load failure.
+ *
+ * @drvdata: driver data to map into.
+ * @reg: register to map.
+ * @offset: device offset for the register
+ */
+static int etm4_cfg_map_reg_offset(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata,
+ struct cscfg_reg_csdev *reg, u32 offset)
+{
+ int err = -EINVAL, idx;
+ struct etmv4_config *drvcfg = &drvdata->config;
+ u32 off_mask;
+
+#define CHECKREG(cval, elem) \
+ { \
+ if (offset == cval) { \
+ reg->drv_store = &drvcfg->elem; \
+ err = 0; \
+ break; \
+ } \
+ }
+
+#define CHECKREGIDX(cval, elem, off_idx, mask) \
+ { \
+ if (mask == cval) { \
+ reg->drv_store = &drvcfg->elem[off_idx]; \
+ err = 0; \
+ break; \
+ } \
+ }
+

I think we can live with switch-case, ignoring the Warnings generated by the
checkpatch, making the code much more readable and less error prone.

Otherwise, please could you move the above macro definitions to the top,
outside this function ?

+ if (((offset >= TRCEVENTCTL0R) && (offset <= TRCVIPCSSCTLR)) ||
+ ((offset >= TRCSEQRSTEVR) && (offset <= TRCEXTINSELR)) ||
+ ((offset >= TRCCIDCCTLR0) && (offset <= TRCVMIDCCTLR1))) {
+ do {
+ CHECKREG(TRCEVENTCTL0R, eventctrl0);
+ CHECKREG(TRCEVENTCTL1R, eventctrl1);
+ CHECKREG(TRCSTALLCTLR, stall_ctrl);
+ CHECKREG(TRCTSCTLR, ts_ctrl);
+ CHECKREG(TRCSYNCPR, syncfreq);
+ CHECKREG(TRCCCCTLR, ccctlr);
+ CHECKREG(TRCBBCTLR, bb_ctrl);
+ CHECKREG(TRCVICTLR, vinst_ctrl);
+ CHECKREG(TRCVIIECTLR, viiectlr);
+ CHECKREG(TRCVISSCTLR, vissctlr);
+ CHECKREG(TRCVIPCSSCTLR, vipcssctlr);
+ CHECKREG(TRCSEQRSTEVR, seq_rst);
+ CHECKREG(TRCSEQSTR, seq_state);
+ CHECKREG(TRCEXTINSELR, ext_inp);
+ CHECKREG(TRCCIDCCTLR0, ctxid_mask0);
+ CHECKREG(TRCCIDCCTLR1, ctxid_mask1);
+ CHECKREG(TRCVMIDCCTLR0, vmid_mask0);
+ CHECKREG(TRCVMIDCCTLR1, vmid_mask1);
+ } while (0);
+ } else if ((offset & GENMASK(11, 4)) == TRCSEQEVRn(0)) {
+ /* sequencer state control registers */
+ idx = (offset & GENMASK(3, 0)) / 4;
+ if (idx < ETM_MAX_SEQ_STATES) {
+ reg->drv_store = &drvcfg->seq_ctrl[idx];
+ err = 0;
+ }
+ } else if ((offset >= TRCSSCCRn(0)) && (offset <= TRCSSPCICRn(7))) {
+ /* 32 bit, 8 off indexed register sets */
+ idx = (offset & GENMASK(4, 0)) / 4;
+ off_mask = (offset & GENMASK(11, 5));
+ do {
+ CHECKREGIDX(TRCSSCCRn(0), ss_ctrl, idx, off_mask);
+ CHECKREGIDX(TRCSSCSRn(0), ss_status, idx, off_mask);
+ CHECKREGIDX(TRCSSPCICRn(0), ss_pe_cmp, idx, off_mask);
+ } while (0);
+ } else if ((offset >= TRCCIDCVRn(0)) && (offset <= TRCVMIDCVRn(7))) {
+ /* 64 bit, 8 off indexed register sets */
+ idx = (offset & GENMASK(5, 0)) / 8;
+ off_mask = (offset & GENMASK(11, 6));
+ do {
+ CHECKREGIDX(TRCCIDCVRn(0), ctxid_pid, idx, off_mask);
+ CHECKREGIDX(TRCVMIDCVRn(0), vmid_val, idx, off_mask);
+ } while (0);
+ } else if ((offset >= TRCRSCTLRn(2)) &&
+ (offset <= TRCRSCTLRn((ETM_MAX_RES_SEL - 1)))) {
+ /* 32 bit resource selection regs, 32 off, skip fixed 0,1 */
+ idx = (offset & GENMASK(6, 0)) / 4;
+ if (idx < ETM_MAX_RES_SEL) {
+ reg->drv_store = &drvcfg->res_ctrl[idx];
+ err = 0;
+ }
+ } else if ((offset >= TRCACVRn(0)) &&
+ (offset <= TRCACATRn((ETM_MAX_SINGLE_ADDR_CMP - 1)))) {
+ /* 64 bit addr cmp regs, 16 off */
+ idx = (offset & GENMASK(6, 0)) / 8;
+ off_mask = offset & GENMASK(11, 7);
+ do {
+ CHECKREGIDX(TRCACVRn(0), addr_val, idx, off_mask);
+ CHECKREGIDX(TRCACATRn(0), addr_acc, idx, off_mask);

What happens if the ETM doesn't have enough resources ? Do we fail the load
here ? Or do we fail the activation during enabling the ETM ? Or do we assume
all ETMs have the resources required for statically defined configs ?

+ } while (0);
+ } else if ((offset >= TRCCNTRLDVRn(0)) &&
+ (offset <= TRCCNTVRn((ETMv4_MAX_CNTR - 1)))) {
+ /* 32 bit counter regs, 4 off (ETMv4_MAX_CNTR - 1) */
+ idx = (offset & GENMASK(3, 0)) / 4;
+ off_mask = offset & GENMASK(11, 4);
+ do {
+ CHECKREGIDX(TRCCNTRLDVRn(0), cntrldvr, idx, off_mask);
+ CHECKREGIDX(TRCCNTCTLRn(0), cntr_ctrl, idx, off_mask);
+ CHECKREGIDX(TRCCNTVRn(0), cntr_val, idx, off_mask);
+ } while (0);
+ }
+ return err;
+}
+
+/**
+ * etm4_cfg_load_feature - load a feature into a device instance.
+ *
+ * @csdev: An ETMv4 CoreSight device.
+ * @feat: The feature to be loaded.
+ *
+ * The function will load a feature instance into the device, checking that
+ * the register definitions are valid for the device.
+ *
+ * Parameter and register definitions will be converted into internal
+ * structures that are used to set the values in the driver when the
+ * feature is enabled for the device.
+ *
+ * The feature spinlock pointer is initialised to the same spinlock
+ * that the driver uses to protect the internal register values.
+ */
+static int etm4_cfg_load_feature(struct coresight_device *csdev,
+ struct cscfg_feature_csdev *feat)
+{
+ struct device *dev = csdev->dev.parent;
+ struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ const struct cscfg_feature_desc *feat_desc = feat->desc;
+ u32 offset;
+ int i = 0, err = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * essential we set the device spinlock - this is used in the generic
+ * programming routines when copying values into the drvdata structures
+ * via the pointers setup in etm4_cfg_map_reg_offset().
+ */
+ feat->csdev_spinlock = &drvdata->spinlock;
+
+ /* process the register descriptions */
+ for (i = 0; i < feat->nr_regs && !err; i++) {
+ offset = feat_desc->regs[i].offset;
+ err = etm4_cfg_map_reg_offset(drvdata, &feat->regs[i], offset);
+ }
+ return err;
+}
+
+/* match information when loading configurations */
+#define CS_CFG_ETM4_MATCH_FLAGS (CS_CFG_MATCH_CLASS_SRC_ALL | \
+ CS_CFG_MATCH_CLASS_SRC_ETM4)
+
+int etm4_cscfg_register(struct coresight_device *csdev, const char *dev_name)
+{
+ struct cscfg_match_desc cfg_info;
+ struct cscfg_csdev_feat_ops ops;
+
+ cfg_info.match_flags = CS_CFG_ETM4_MATCH_FLAGS;
+
+ ops.load_feat = &etm4_cfg_load_feature;
+
+ return cscfg_register_csdev(csdev, &cfg_info, &ops);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.h b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9e279c5da55d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.h
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2014-2015, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _CORESIGHT_CORESIGHT_ETM4X_CFG_H
+#define _CORESIGHT_CORESIGHT_ETM4X_CFG_H
+
+#include "coresight-config.h"
+#include "coresight-etm4x.h"
+
+/* ETMv4 specific config defines */
+
+/* resource IDs */
+
+#define ETM4_CFG_RES_CTR 0x001
+#define ETM4_CFG_RES_CMP 0x002
+#define ETM4_CFG_RES_CMP_PAIR0 0x003
+#define ETM4_CFG_RES_CMP_PAIR1 0x004
+#define ETM4_CFG_RES_SEL 0x005
+#define ETM4_CFG_RES_SEL_PAIR0 0x006
+#define ETM4_CFG_RES_SEL_PAIR1 0x007
+#define ETM4_CFG_RES_SEQ 0x008
+#define ETM4_CFG_RES_TS 0x009
+#define ETM4_CFG_RES_MASK 0x00F

Where are these used ? Probably better to move it to the patch
where they are actually used.

Suzuki