Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Simplify refclk handling

From: Robert Foss
Date: Fri Mar 05 2021 - 05:01:46 EST


Hey Douglas,

Thanks for submitting this cleanup, it looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxx>


On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 00:53, Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The clock framework makes it simple to deal with an optional clock.
> You can call clk_get_optional() and if the clock isn't specified it'll
> just return NULL without complaint. It's valid to pass NULL to
> enable/disable/prepare/unprepare. Let's make use of this to simplify
> things a tiny bit.
>
> NOTE: this makes things look a tad bit asymmetric now since we check
> for NULL before clk_prepare_enable() but not for
> clk_disable_unprepare(). This seemed OK to me. We already have to
> check for NULL in the enable case anyway so why not avoid the extra
> call?

I think this is fine. Since the refclk != NULL check in
ti_sn_bridge_set_refclk_freq is in order to determine other behaviour,
the asymmetry is required.

>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 11 +++--------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index f27306c51e4d..942019842ff4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -1261,14 +1261,9 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - pdata->refclk = devm_clk_get(pdata->dev, "refclk");
> - if (IS_ERR(pdata->refclk)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(pdata->refclk);
> - if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> - return ret;
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("refclk not found\n");
> - pdata->refclk = NULL;
> - }
> + pdata->refclk = devm_clk_get_optional(pdata->dev, "refclk");
> + if (IS_ERR(pdata->refclk))
> + return PTR_ERR(pdata->refclk);
>
> ret = ti_sn_bridge_parse_dsi_host(pdata);
> if (ret)
> --
> 2.30.1.766.gb4fecdf3b7-goog
>