Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] pwm: pca9685: Switch to atomic API

[Clemens Gruber]

Hi Uwe,

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 10:41:15PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:10:10PM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:48 AM Clemens Gruber
> > <clemens.gruber@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > I can initialize the values to 0 of course and check the file for other
> > > places with missing initializations.
> > >
> > > Or would it be better to check the return codes of regmap_read/write in
> > > such cases? I'm not sure.
> > 
> > I think that checking the regmap_read/write return values is overkill
> > in this driver. These functions can't realistically fail, except if the i2c
> > bus is bad, i.e. h/w failure or intermittency. And that's an externality
> > which I believe we can ignore.
> > 
> > Maybe Thierry or Uwe have further insights here.
> 
> I'm a fan of full checking, but I'm not sure what's Thierry's position
> on that.
> 
> My reasoning is: If the bus is bad and a request to modify the PWM fails
> because of that, the PWM consumer probably wants to know.

I see. Then I'd suggest that we postpone adding these checks until we
get a response from Thierry and if he agrees with you, we could add
these checks in a separate patch series?

Thanks,
Clemens