Re: exec error: BUG: Bad rss-counter

[Eric W. Biederman]

Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 11:37 AM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 12:43 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Eric, All,
>> >> >
>> >> > The following error appears when running Linux 5.10.18 on an embedded
>> >> > MIPS mt7621 target:
>> >> > [    0.301219] BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:(ptrval) type:MM_ANONPAGES val:1
>> >> >
>> >> > Being a very generic error, I started digging and added a stack dump
>> >> > before the BUG:
>> >> > Call Trace:
>> >> > [<80008094>] show_stack+0x30/0x100
>> >> > [<8033b238>] dump_stack+0xac/0xe8
>> >> > [<800285e8>] __mmdrop+0x98/0x1d0
>> >> > [<801a6de8>] free_bprm+0x44/0x118
>> >> > [<801a86a8>] kernel_execve+0x160/0x1d8
>> >> > [<800420f4>] call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0x114/0x194
>> >> > [<80003198>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
>> >> >
>> >> > So that's how I got to looking at fs/exec.c and noticed quite a few
>> >> > changes last year. Turns out this message only occurs once very early
>> >> > at boot during the very first call to kernel_execve. current->mm is
>> >> > NULL at this stage, so acct_arg_size() is effectively a no-op.
>> >>
>> >> If you believe this is a new error you could bisect the kernel
>> >> to see which change introduced the behavior you are seeing.
>> >>
>> >> > More digging, and I traced the RSS counter increment to:
>> >> > [<8015adb4>] add_mm_counter_fast+0xb4/0xc0
>> >> > [<80160d58>] handle_mm_fault+0x6e4/0xea0
>> >> > [<80158aa4>] __get_user_pages.part.78+0x190/0x37c
>> >> > [<8015992c>] __get_user_pages_remote+0x128/0x360
>> >> > [<801a6d9c>] get_arg_page+0x34/0xa0
>> >> > [<801a7394>] copy_string_kernel+0x194/0x2a4
>> >> > [<801a880c>] kernel_execve+0x11c/0x298
>> >> > [<800420f4>] call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0x114/0x194
>> >> > [<80003198>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
>> >> >
>> >> > In fact, I also checked vma_pages(bprm->vma) and lo and behold it is set to 1.
>> >> >
>> >> > How is fs/exec.c supposed to handle implied RSS increments that happen
>> >> > due to page faults when discarding the bprm structure? In this case,
>> >> > the bug-generating kernel_execve call never succeeded, it returned -2,
>> >> > but I didn't trace exactly what failed.
>> >>
>> >> Unless I am mistaken any left over pages should be purged by exit_mmap
>> >> which is called by mmput before mmput calls mmdrop.
>> > Good to know. Some more digging and I can say that we hit this error
>> > when trying to unmap PFN 0 (is_zero_pfn(pfn) returns TRUE,
>> > vm_normal_page returns NULL, zap_pte_range does not decrement
>> > MM_ANONPAGES RSS counter). Is my understanding correct that PFN 0 is
>> > usable, but special? Or am I totally off the mark here?
>>
>> It would be good to know if that is the page that get_user_pages_remote
>> returned to copy_string_kernel.  The zero page that is always zero,
>> should never be returned when a writable mapping is desired.
>
> Indeed, pfn 0 is returned from get_arg_page: (page is 0x809cf000,
> page_to_pfn(page) is 0) and it is the same page that is being freed and not
> refcounted in mmput/zap_pte_range. Confirmed with good old printk. Also,
> ZERO_PAGE(0)==0x809fc000 -> PFN 5120.
>
> I think I have found the problem though, after much digging and thanks to all
> the information provided. init_zero_pfn() gets called too late (after
> the call to
> is_zero_pfn(0) from mmput returns true), until then zero_pfn == 0, and after,
> zero_pfn == 5120. Boom.
>
> So PFN 0 is special, but only for a little bit, enough for something
> on my system
> to call kernel_execve :)
>
> Question: is my system not supposed to be calling kernel_execve this
> early or does
> init_zero_pfn() need to happen earlier? init_zero_pfn is currently a
> core_initcall.

Looking quickly it seems that init_zero_pfn() is in mm/memory.c and is
common for both mips and x86.  Further it appears init_zero_pfn() has
been that was since 2009 a13ea5b75964 ("mm: reinstate ZERO_PAGE").

Given the testing that x86 gets and that nothing like this has been
reported it looks like whatever driver is triggering the kernel_execve
is doing something wrong. 

Because honestly.  If the zero page isn't working there is not a chance
that anything in userspace is working so it is clearly much too early.

I suspect there is some driver that is initialized very early that is
doing something that looks innocuous (like triggering a hotplug event)
and that happens to cause a call_usermode_helper which then calls
kernel_execve.

Eric