回复: [PATCH v2] workqueue: Move the position of debug_work_activate() in __queue_work()

[Zhang, Qiang]

Hello Tejun

Please review this change.

Thanks
Qiang

>________________________________________
>发件人: Zhang, Qiang <qiang.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>发送时间: 2021年2月18日 11:17
>收件人: jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx; tj@xxxxxxxxxx
>抄送: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>主题: [PATCH v2] workqueue: Move the position of >debug_work_activate() in __queue_work()
>
>From: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>The debug_work_activate() is called on the premise that
>the work can be inserted, because if wq be in WQ_DRAINING
>status, insert work may be failed.
>
>Fixes: e41e704bc4f4 ("workqueue: improve destroy_workqueue() >debuggability")
>Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx>
>---
>v1->v2:
> add Fixes tag.
>
> kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
>index 0d150da252e8..21fb00b52def 100644
>--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
>+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
>@@ -1412,7 +1412,6 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct >workqueue_struct *wq,
>         */
>        lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
>
>-       debug_work_activate(work);
>
>        /* if draining, only works from the same workqueue are allowed >*/
>       if (unlikely(wq->flags & __WQ_DRAINING) &&
>@@ -1494,6 +1493,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct >workqueue_struct *wq,
>                worklist = &pwq->delayed_works;
>        }
>
>+       debug_work_activate(work);
>        insert_work(pwq, work, worklist, work_flags);
>
> out:
>--
>2.25.1