Re: linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the powerpc tree

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon Feb 22 2021 - 18:57:57 EST


Hi Stephen,

On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:31:42 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the spi tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c
>
> between commit:
>
> e10656114d32 ("spi: mpc52xx: Avoid using get_tbl()")
>
> from the powerpc tree and commit:
>
> 258ea99fe25a ("spi: spi-mpc52xx: Use new structure for SPI transfer delays")
>
> from the spi tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c
> index e6a30f232370,36f941500676..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c
> @@@ -247,8 -247,10 +247,10 @@@ static int mpc52xx_spi_fsmstate_transfe
> /* Is the transfer complete? */
> ms->len--;
> if (ms->len == 0) {
> - ms->timestamp = get_tbl();
> + ms->timestamp = mftb();
> - ms->timestamp += ms->transfer->delay_usecs * tb_ticks_per_usec;
> + if (ms->transfer->delay.unit == SPI_DELAY_UNIT_USECS)
> + ms->timestamp += ms->transfer->delay.value *
> + tb_ticks_per_usec;
> ms->state = mpc52xx_spi_fsmstate_wait;
> return FSM_CONTINUE;
> }

This is now a conflict between the powerpc tree and Linus' tree.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgp1oTlpIB68f.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature