On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 2:05 AM Martin Schiller <ms@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What kind of packages do you mean are corrupted?
ETH_P_X25 or ETH_P_HDLC?
I mean ETH_P_X25. I was using "lapbether.c" to test so there was no ETH_P_HDLC.
I have also sent a patch here in the past that addressed corrupted
ETH_P_X25 frames on an AF_PACKET socket:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/13/388
Unfortunately I could not track and describe exactly where the problem
was.
Ah... Looks like we had the same problem.
I just wonder when/where is the logically correct place to copy the skb.
Shouldn't it be copied before removing the pseudo header (as I did in my
patch)?
I think it's not necessary to copy it before removing the pseudo
header, because "skb_pull" will not change any data in the data
buffer. "skb_pull" will only change the values of "skb->data" and
"skb->len". These values are not shared between clones of skbs, so
it's safe to change them without affecting other clones of the skb.
I also choose to copy the skb in the LAPB module (rather than in the
drivers) because I see all drivers have this problem (including the
recently deleted x25_asy.c driver), so it'd be better to fix this
issue in the LAPB module, for all drivers.