Re: [PATCH] net: mdiobus: Prevent spike on MDIO bus reset signal

From: Jakub Kicinski
Date: Wed Jan 27 2021 - 17:57:40 EST


On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 08:08:29 +0100 Mike Looijmans wrote:
> > Andrew, I don't get what you're saying.
> >
> > Here is what happens depending on the pre-existing state of the
> > reset signal:
> >
> > Reset (previously asserted): ~~~|_|~~~~|_______
> > Reset (previously deasserted): _____|~~~~|_______
> > ^ ^ ^
> > A B C
> >
> > At point A, the low going transition is because the reset line is
> > requested using GPIOD_OUT_LOW. If the line is successfully requested,
> > the first thing we do is set it high _without_ any delay. This is
> > point B. So, a glitch occurs between A and B.
> >
> > We then fsleep() and finally set the GPIO low at point C.
> >
> > Requesting the line using GPIOD_OUT_HIGH eliminates the A and B
> > transitions. Instead we get:
> >
> > Reset (previously asserted) : ~~~~~~~~~~|______
> > Reset (previously deasserted): ____|~~~~~|______
> > ^ ^
> > A C
> >
> > Where A and C are the points described above in the code. Point B
> > has been eliminated.
> >
> > Therefore, to me the patch looks entirely reasonable and correct.
> >
> Thanks, excellent explanation.
>
> As a bit of background, we were using a Marvell PHY where the datasheet
> states that thou shallt not release the reset within 50 ms of power-up.
> A pull-down on the active-low reset was thus added. Looking at the reset
> signal with a scope revealed a short spike, visible only because it was
> being controlled by an I2C GPIO expander. So it's indeed point "B" that
> we wanted to eliminate.

This is all useful information - can we roll more of it into the commit
message? I'd think that calling out the part and the 50ms value could
make things more "concrete" for a reader down the line?