Re: [PATCH] include: sysfs: Add macro to assign show for RO attributes

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 08:51:26PM +0800, Orson Zhai wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 08:50:28AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:19:22PM +0800, Orson Zhai wrote:
> > > In some circumstances, multiple __ATTR_RO attributes need to be assigned
> > > with a single show function.
> > > 
> > > Add this macro to make life easier with simple code.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst | 2 ++
> > >  include/linux/sysfs.h               | 5 +++++
> > >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst
> > > index 004d490..0e2274a 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst
> > > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst
> > > @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ __ATTR_RO_MODE(name, mode):
> > >  	         fore more restrictive RO access currently
> > >                   only use case is the EFI System Resource Table
> > >                   (see drivers/firmware/efi/esrt.c)
> > > +__ATTR_RO_SHOW(name, show):
> > > +		 assumes default mode 0444 with specified show.
> > >  __ATTR_RW(name):
> > >  	         assumes default name_show, name_store and setting
> > >                   mode to 0644.
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/sysfs.h b/include/linux/sysfs.h
> > > index 2caa34c..c851592 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/sysfs.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/sysfs.h
> > > @@ -117,6 +117,11 @@ struct attribute_group {
> > >  	.show	= _name##_show,						\
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +#define __ATTR_RO_SHOW(_name, _show) {					\
> > > +	.attr	= { .name = __stringify(_name), .mode = 0444 },		\
> > > +	.show	= _show,						\
> > > +}
> > 
> > Do you have a real user for this?  Using "raw" kobject attributes is
> 
> Yes, I have found at least one user in current kernel code.
> 
> Please refer to [1].
> 
> The author implemented a similar marcro __ATRR_MRO as mine, plus an
> __ATRR_MWO with specified restore.

Ick, no, that should be using DEVICE_ATTR_RO() as it is a struct device
attribute, not a "raw" kobject attribute.  So that code should be fixed
up anyway, no need for this macro :)

> 
> If this patch merged, I'd to replace his marcro with mine.
> 
> > rare and should not be used often, so who needs this?
> 
> Agree. But for some device drivers it might be useful without side effect.

Drivers should NOT be ever using __ATTR* macros.  That is not what they
are there for.

> Another example is from Android increment-fs code out there.
> That driver has 3 sysfs attributes which shared with same show function
> which only prints "support" to userland.

I can't take patches for out-of-tree code, sorry, you know this :)

thanks,

greg k-h