Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Use boolean returns for (S)PTE accessors

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 23/01/21 01:30, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Return a 'bool' instead of an 'int' for various PTE accessors that are
> boolean in nature, e.g. is_shadow_present_pte().  Returning an int is
> goofy and potentially dangerous, e.g. if a flag being checked is moved
> into the upper 32 bits of a SPTE, then the compiler may silently squash
> the entire check since casting to an int is guaranteed to yield a
> return value of '0'.
>
> Opportunistically refactor is_last_spte() so that it naturally returns
> a bool value instead of letting it implicitly cast 0/1 to false/true.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h      |  2 +-
>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 12 ++++--------
>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> index 581925e476d6..f61e18dad2f3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static inline int kvm_mmu_do_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
>    *
>    * TODO: introduce APIs to split these two cases.
>    */
> -static inline int is_writable_pte(unsigned long pte)
> +static inline bool is_writable_pte(unsigned long pte)
>   {
>   	return pte & PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
>   }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
> index 2b3a30bd38b0..398fd1bb13a7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
> @@ -185,23 +185,19 @@ static inline bool is_access_track_spte(u64 spte)
>   	return !spte_ad_enabled(spte) && (spte & shadow_acc_track_mask) == 0;
>   }
>   
> -static inline int is_shadow_present_pte(u64 pte)
> +static inline bool is_shadow_present_pte(u64 pte)
>   {
>   	return (pte != 0) && !is_mmio_spte(pte);
>   }
>   
> -static inline int is_large_pte(u64 pte)
> +static inline bool is_large_pte(u64 pte)
>   {
>   	return pte & PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK;
>   }
>   
> -static inline int is_last_spte(u64 pte, int level)
> +static inline bool is_last_spte(u64 pte, int level)
>   {
> -	if (level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
> -		return 1;
> -	if (is_large_pte(pte))
> -		return 1;
> -	return 0;
> +	return (level == PG_LEVEL_4K) || is_large_pte(pte);
>   }
>   
>   static inline bool is_executable_pte(u64 spte)

Queued, thanks.

Paolo