Duplicate crash reports related with smsc75xx/smsc95xx and root cause analysis

[慕冬亮]

Dear kernel developers,

I found that on the syzbot dashboard, “KMSAN: uninit-value in
smsc75xx_read_eeprom (2)” [1],
"KMSAN: uninit-value in smsc95xx_read_eeprom (2)" [2], "KMSAN:
uninit-value in smsc75xx_bind" [3],
"KMSAN: uninit-value in smsc95xx_reset" [4], "KMSAN: uninit-value in
smsc95xx_wait_eeprom (2)" [5]
should share the same root cause.

## Root Cause Analysis && Different behaviors

The root cause of these crash reports resides in the
"__smsc75xx_read_reg/__smsc95xx_read_reg". Take __smsc95xx_read_reg as
an example,

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
static int __must_check __smsc95xx_read_reg(struct usbnet *dev, u32 index,
                                            u32 *data, int in_pm)
{
        u32 buf;
        int ret;
        int (*fn)(struct usbnet *, u8, u8, u16, u16, void *, u16);

        BUG_ON(!dev);

        if (!in_pm)
                fn = usbnet_read_cmd;
        else
                fn = usbnet_read_cmd_nopm;

        ret = fn(dev, USB_VENDOR_REQUEST_READ_REGISTER, USB_DIR_IN
                 | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_DEVICE,
                 0, index, &buf, 4);
        if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
                netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to read reg index 0x%08x: %d\n",
                            index, ret);
                return ret;
        }

        le32_to_cpus(&buf);
        *data = buf;

        return ret;
}


static int __must_check smsc95xx_eeprom_confirm_not_busy(struct usbnet *dev)
{
        unsigned long start_time = jiffies;
        u32 val;
        int ret;

        do {
                ret = smsc95xx_read_reg(dev, E2P_CMD, &val);
                if (ret < 0) {
                        netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading E2P_CMD\n");
                        return ret;
                }

                if (!(val & E2P_CMD_BUSY_))
                        return 0;
        ......
}
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In a special situation, local variable "buf" is not initialized with
"fn" function invocation. And the ret is bigger than zero, and buf is
assigned to "*data". In its parent function -
smsc95xx_eeprom_confirm_not_busy, KMSAN reports "uninit-value" when
accessing variable "val".
Note, due to the lack of testing environment, I don't know the
concrete reason for the uninitialization of "buf" local variable.

The reason for such different crash behaviors is that the event -
"buf" is not initialized is random when
"__smsc75xx_read_reg/__smsc95xx_read_reg" is invoked.

## Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c
index 4353b370249f..a8e500d92285 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static int smsc75xx_phy_gig_workaround(struct usbnet *dev);
 static int __must_check __smsc75xx_read_reg(struct usbnet *dev, u32 index,
                                            u32 *data, int in_pm)
 {
-       u32 buf;
+       u32 buf = 0;
        int ret;
        int (*fn)(struct usbnet *, u8, u8, u16, u16, void *, u16);

diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c
index 4c8ee1cff4d4..dae3be723e0c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(turbo_mode, "Enable multiple frames
per Rx transaction");
 static int __must_check __smsc95xx_read_reg(struct usbnet *dev, u32 index,
                                            u32 *data, int in_pm)
 {
-       u32 buf;
+       u32 buf = 0;
        int ret;
        int (*fn)(struct usbnet *, u8, u8, u16, u16, void *, u16);

If you can have any issues with this statement or our information is
useful to you, please let us know. Thanks very much.

[1] “KMSAN: uninit-value in smsc75xx_read_eeprom (2)” - url
[2] “KMSAN: uninit-value in smsc95xx_read_eeprom (2)” - URL
[3] "KMSAN: uninit-value in smsc75xx_bind" -
[4] "KMSAN: uninit-value in smsc95xx_reset" -
[5] "KMSAN: uninit-value in smsc95xx_wait_eeprom (2)" -

--
My best regards to you.

     No System Is Safe!
     Dongliang Mu