Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 0/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller

[Florian Fainelli]

On 1/14/2021 12:46 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 1/5/21 1:22 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 12/23/20 4:05 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/16/2020 1:41 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>>>> v3 -- discard commit from v2; instead rely on the new function
>>>>       reset_control_rearm provided in a recent commit [1] applied
>>>>       to reset/next.
>>>>    -- New commit to correct pcie-brcmstb.c usage of a reset controller
>>>>       to use reset/rearm verses deassert/assert.
>>>>
>>>> v2 -- refactor rescal-reset driver to implement assert/deassert rather than
>>>>       reset because the reset call only fires once per lifetime and we need
>>>>       to reset after every resume from S2 or S3.
>>>>    -- Split the use of "ahci" and "rescal" controllers in separate fields
>>>>       to keep things simple.
>>>>
>>>> v1 -- original
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] Applied commit "reset: make shared pulsed reset controls re-triggerable"
>>>>     found at git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git
>>>>     branch reset/shared-retrigger
>>>
>>> The changes in that branch above have now landed in Linus' tree with:
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=557acb3d2cd9c82de19f944f6cc967a347735385
>>>
>>> It would be good if we could get both patches applied via the same tree
>>> or within the same cycle to avoid having either PCIe or SATA broken on
>>> these platforms.
>>
>> Ping? Can someone apply those patches if you are happy with them? Thank you.
> 
> Ping? Can we review and ideally also apply these patches? Thanks

Is there something going on preventing these patches from being reviewed
and/or applied?
-- 
Florian