Re: [PATCH v7 14/17] media/videobuf1|2: Mark follow_pfn usage as unsafe

[Hans Verkuil]

On 27/11/2020 17:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The media model assumes that buffers are all preallocated, so that
> when a media pipeline is running we never miss a deadline because the
> buffers aren't allocated or available.
> 
> This means we cannot fix the v4l follow_pfn usage through
> mmu_notifier, without breaking how this all works. The only real fix
> is to deprecate userptr support for VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP mappings and
> tell everyone to cut over to dma-buf memory sharing for zerocopy.
> 
> userptr for normal memory will keep working as-is, this only affects
> the zerocopy userptr usage enabled in 50ac952d2263 ("[media]
> videobuf2-dma-sg: Support io userptr operations on io memory").
> 
> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards,

	Hans

> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Pawel Osciak <pawel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> --
> v3:
> - Reference the commit that enabled the zerocopy userptr use case to
>   make it abundandtly clear that this patch only affects that, and not
>   normal memory userptr. The old commit message already explained that
>   normal memory userptr is unaffected, but I guess that was not clear
>   enough.
> ---
>  drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c
> index a0e65481a201..1a82ec13ea00 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ int get_vaddr_frames(unsigned long start, unsigned int nr_frames,
>  			break;
>  
>  		while (ret < nr_frames && start + PAGE_SIZE <= vma->vm_end) {
> -			err = follow_pfn(vma, start, &nums[ret]);
> +			err = unsafe_follow_pfn(vma, start, &nums[ret]);
>  			if (err) {
>  				if (ret == 0)
>  					ret = err;
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c
> index 52312ce2ba05..821c4a76ab96 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c
> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int videobuf_dma_contig_user_get(struct videobuf_dma_contig_memory *mem,
>  	user_address = untagged_baddr;
>  
>  	while (pages_done < (mem->size >> PAGE_SHIFT)) {
> -		ret = follow_pfn(vma, user_address, &this_pfn);
> +		ret = unsafe_follow_pfn(vma, user_address, &this_pfn);
>  		if (ret)
>  			break;
>  
>