Re: [PATCH] USB: serial: cp210x: Fix error 32 when hardware flow control is enabled.

From: Johan Hovold
Date: Tue Jan 19 2021 - 07:00:22 EST


On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:42:33AM +0000, Pho Tran wrote:
> Fix error 32 returned by CP210X_SET_MHS when hardware flow control is enabled.
>
> The root cause of error 32 is that user application (CoolTerm, linux-serial-test)
> opened cp210x device with hardware flow control then attempt to control RTS/DTR pins.
> In hardware flow control, RTS/DTR pins will be controlled by hardware only,
> any attempt to control those pins will cause error 32 from the device.
> This fix will block MHS command(command to control RTS/DTR pins) to the device
> if hardware flow control is being used.

Ok, thanks for adding some background.

> Signed-off-by: Pho Tran <pho.tran@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Always include a changelog here (after "---") when updating a patch so
we know what changed.

Also include the patch revision in the Subject (e.g. "[PATCH v3] USB:
...").

> drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c b/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c
> index fbb10dfc56e3..3694b7c62290 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c
> @@ -1211,6 +1211,12 @@ static int cp210x_tiocmset_port(struct usb_serial_port *port,
> unsigned int set, unsigned int clear)
> {
> u16 control = 0;
> + struct cp210x_flow_ctl flow_ctl;
> + u32 ctl_hs = 0;
> + u32 flow_repl = 0;
> + bool auto_dtr = false;
> + bool auto_rts = false;
> + int ret;
>
> if (set & TIOCM_RTS) {
> control |= CONTROL_RTS;
> @@ -1231,6 +1237,27 @@ static int cp210x_tiocmset_port(struct usb_serial_port *port,
>
> dev_dbg(&port->dev, "%s - control = 0x%.4x\n", __func__, control);
>
> + // Don't send MHS command if device in hardware flowcontrol mode

Please don't use // comments.

> + ret = cp210x_read_reg_block(port, CP210X_GET_FLOW, &flow_ctl, sizeof(flow_ctl));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;

We should just add a flag to the port data structure to reflect the
hardware flow control setting (which is set in the new function
cp210x_set_flow_control()). There's no need to query the device here
just to determine if flow control is enabled.

> +
> + ctl_hs = le32_to_cpu(flow_ctl.ulControlHandshake);
> + flow_repl = le32_to_cpu(flow_ctl.ulFlowReplace);
> +
> + if (CP210X_SERIAL_DTR_SHIFT(CP210X_SERIAL_DTR_FLOW_CTL) == (ctl_hs & CP210X_SERIAL_DTR_MASK))
> + auto_dtr = true;
> + else
> + auto_dtr = false;

We don't use DTR flow control (and always disable it) so no need to
check this either.

> +
> + if (CP210X_SERIAL_RTS_SHIFT(CP210X_SERIAL_RTS_FLOW_CTL) == (flow_repl & CP210X_SERIAL_RTS_MASK))
> + auto_rts = true;
> + else
> + auto_rts = false;
> +
> + if (auto_dtr || auto_rts)
> + return 0;

So this makes userspace think that a request to TIOCMSET succeeded, when
in fact it did not.

Eventually, we should instead manage the hardware flow control setting
also from tiocmset() so that a request to deassert DTR/RTS always does
just that, that is, also when hw flow control is enabled. Similarly,
reasserting RTS should re-enable flow control.

> +
> return cp210x_write_u16_reg(port, CP210X_SET_MHS, control);
> }

I think we should leave TIOCMSET for now and only suppress the error at
port open and close.

I've implemented what I've outline above as the patch below.

Johan