Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with unmanaged ASIDs

[Auger Eric]

Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe,

On 12/4/20 11:23 AM, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe,
> 
> On 12/4/20 11:20 AM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
>> Hi Jean,
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx]
>>> Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54
>>> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Auger Eric <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>; wangxingang
>>> <wangxingang5@xxxxxxxxxx>; Xieyingtai <xieyingtai@xxxxxxxxxx>;
>>> kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; maz@xxxxxxxxxx; joro@xxxxxxxxxx; will@xxxxxxxxxx;
>>> iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>>> vivek.gautam@xxxxxxx; alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx;
>>> zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxx; robin.murphy@xxxxxxx;
>>> kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; eric.auger.pro@xxxxxxxxx; Zengtao (B)
>>> <prime.zeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; qubingbing <qubingbing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with
>>> unmanaged ASIDs
>>>
>>> Hi Shameer,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
>>>> Hi Jean/zhangfei,
>>>> Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related
>>> patches
>>>> that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin of
>>> Eric's series?
>>>> Please share your thoughts.
>>>
>>> By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches
>>> based on mainline? 
>>
>> Yes. 
>>
>>  The uacce-devel branches from
>>> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment
>>> (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch
>>> https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.)
As I plan to respin shortly, please could you confirm the best branch to
rebase on still is that one (uacce-devel from the linux-kernel-uadk git
repo). Is it up to date? Commits seem to be quite old there.

Thanks

Eric
>>
>> Thanks. 
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make sense
>> to rebase on top of either of those?
>>
>> From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that.
> 
> Sure. I will rebase on top of this ;-)
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Eric
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shameer
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jean
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
>