Re: [PATCH] riscv: add BUILTIN_DTB support for MMU-enabled targets

From: Anup Patel
Date: Mon Dec 28 2020 - 09:59:23 EST


On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:05 PM Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 12:59 PM Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 10:03 PM Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sometimes, especially in a production system we may not want to
> > > use a "smart bootloader" like u-boot to load kernel, ramdisk and
> > > device tree from a filesystem on eMMC, but rather load the kernel
> > > from a NAND partition and just run it as soon as we can, and in
> > > this case it is convenient to have device tree compiled into the
> > > kernel binary. Since this case is not limited to MMU-less systems,
> > > let's support it for these which have MMU enabled too.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 -
> > > arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > > index 2b41f6d8e458..9464b4e3a71a 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > > @@ -419,7 +419,6 @@ endmenu
> > >
> > > config BUILTIN_DTB
> > > def_bool n
> > > - depends on RISCV_M_MODE
> > > depends on OF
> > >
> > > menu "Power management options"
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > > index 87c305c566ac..5d1c7a3ec01c 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > > @@ -194,12 +194,20 @@ void __init setup_bootmem(void)
> > > setup_initrd();
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD */
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * If DTB is built in, no need to reserve its memblock.
> > > + * OTOH, initial_boot_params has to be set to properly copy DTB
> > > + * before unflattening later on.
> > > + */
> > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB))
> > > + initial_boot_params = __va(dtb_early_pa);
> >
> > Don't assign initial_boot_params directly here because the
> > early_init_dt_scan() will do it.
>
> early_init_dt_scan will set initial_boot_params to dtb_early_va from
> the early mapping which will be gone by the time
> unflatten_and_copy_device_tree() is called.

The throw-away early DTB mapping in early_pg_dir is anyway
redundant when we have built-in DTB so this patch needs to
add an "#ifdef" around it for the MMU-enabled case. Also, please
update dtb_early_va and dtb_early_pa separately for MMU-enabled
case in the setup_vm()

>
> > The setup_vm() is supposed to setup dtb_early_va and dtb_early_pa
> > for MMU-enabled case so please add a "#ifdef" over there for the
> > built-in DTB case.
> >
> > > + else
> > > + memblock_reserve(dtb_early_pa, fdt_totalsize(dtb_early_va));
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * Avoid using early_init_fdt_reserve_self() since __pa() does
> > > * not work for DTB pointers that are fixmap addresses
> > > */
> >
> > This comment needs to be updated and moved along the memblock_reserve()
> > statement.
> >
> > > - memblock_reserve(dtb_early_pa, fdt_totalsize(dtb_early_va));
> > > -
> > > early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
> > > dma_contiguous_reserve(dma32_phys_limit);
> > > memblock_allow_resize();
> > > --
> > > 2.29.2
> > >
> >
> > This patch should be based upon Damiens builtin DTB patch.
> > Refer, https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg56616.html
>
> Thanks for the pointer, however I don't think our patches have
> intersections. Besides, Damien is dealing with the MMU-less case
> there.
>
> Best regards,
> Vitaly

Regards,
Anup