Re: [PATCH V2 06/12] perf mem: Clean up output format

From: Liang, Kan
Date: Mon Dec 07 2020 - 15:21:00 EST




On 12/4/2020 6:27 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 09:27:57AM -0800, kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

SNIP

@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ dump_raw_samples(struct perf_tool *tool,
{
struct perf_mem *mem = container_of(tool, struct perf_mem, tool);
struct addr_location al;
- const char *fmt;
+ const char *fmt, *field_sep;
if (machine__resolve(machine, &al, sample) < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "problem processing %d event, skipping it.\n",
@@ -186,60 +186,41 @@ dump_raw_samples(struct perf_tool *tool,
if (al.map != NULL)
al.map->dso->hit = 1;
- if (mem->phys_addr) {
- if (symbol_conf.field_sep) {
- fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%016"PRIx64
- "%s%"PRIu64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
- } else {
- fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64
- "%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64
- "%s%s:%s\n";
- symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
- }
-
- printf(fmt,
- sample->pid,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->tid,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->ip,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->addr,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->phys_addr,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->weight,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->data_src,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
- al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
+ field_sep = symbol_conf.field_sep;

hum, what's the point of having field_sep?


To keep the fmt consistent.

The patch divides the "printf(fmt,..." into two part. In the first half part, the symbol_conf.field_sep may be modified to " ";
In the second half part, we should not use the modified symbol_conf.field_sep for the below check. The field_sep keeps the original value and should be used.




+ if (field_sep) {
+ fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s";
} else {
- if (symbol_conf.field_sep) {
- fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%"PRIu64
- "%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
- } else {
- fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64
- "%s%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
- symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
- }
+ fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64"%s";
+ symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
+ }
+ printf(fmt,
+ sample->pid,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep,
+ sample->tid,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep,
+ sample->ip,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep,
+ sample->addr,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep);
- printf(fmt,
- sample->pid,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->tid,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->ip,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->addr,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->weight,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->data_src,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
- al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
+ if (mem->phys_addr) {
+ printf("0x%016"PRIx64"%s",
+ sample->phys_addr,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep);
}
+
+ if (field_sep)
+ fmt = "%"PRIu64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
+ else
+ fmt = "%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
+
+ printf(fmt,
+ sample->weight,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep,
+ sample->data_src,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep,
+ al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
+ al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
out_put:
addr_location__put(&al);
return 0;
@@ -287,10 +268,12 @@ static int report_raw_events(struct perf_mem *mem)
if (ret < 0)
goto out_delete;
+ printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, ");
+
if (mem->phys_addr)
- printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, PHYS ADDR, LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
- else
- printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
+ printf("PHYS ADDR, ");
+
+ printf("LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");

if phys addr is the only member, can't we just squeeze it via
"%s", mem->phys_addr ? "PHYS ADDR" : "",
like I mentioned in the other reply? and same also above?


The phys addr is not the only member, the next patch (07/12) will add data page size as a new member. So I factor out phys_addr in this and the previous patch (05/12).

Thanks,
Kan