Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: decrease the section size to reduce the memory reserved for the page map

[Ard Biesheuvel]

(+ Marc)

On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 12:14, Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:44:43AM +0800, Wei Li wrote:
> > For the memory hole, sparse memory model that define SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> > do not free the reserved memory for the page map, decrease the section
> > size can reduce the waste of reserved memory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Li <liwei213@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Baopeng Feng <fengbaopeng2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Xia Qing <saberlily.xia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h
> > index 1f43fcc79738..8963bd3def28 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sparsemem.h
> > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
> >  #define MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS     CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS
> > -#define SECTION_SIZE_BITS    30
> > +#define SECTION_SIZE_BITS    27
>
> We chose '30' to avoid running out of bits in the page flags. What changed?
>
> With this patch, I can trigger:
>
> ./include/linux/mmzone.h:1170:2: error: Allocator MAX_ORDER exceeds SECTION_SIZE
> #error Allocator MAX_ORDER exceeds SECTION_SIZE
>
> if I bump up NR_CPUS and NODES_SHIFT.
>

Does this mean we will run into problems with the GICv3 ITS LPI tables
again if we are forced to reduce MAX_ORDER to fit inside
SECTION_SIZE_BITS?