Re: [PATCH v2] proc: use untagged_addr() for pagemap_read addresses

From: Miles Chen
Date: Thu Dec 03 2020 - 20:34:16 EST


On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 11:45 +0000, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> Hi Miles,
>
> On 11/27/20 5:07 AM, Miles Chen wrote:
> > When we try to visit the pagemap of a tagged userspace pointer, we find
> > that the start_vaddr is not correct because of the tag.
> > To fix it, we should untag the usespace pointers in pagemap_read().
> >
>
> Nit: s/usespace/userspace/ (please search and replace all occurrences :) )
>
> > I tested with 5.10-rc4 and the issue remains.
> >
> > Explaination from Catalin in [1]:
> >
>
> Nit: s/Explaination/Explanation/ (please search and replace all occurrences :) )

thanks, I will fix this and push v3
>
> > "
> > Arguably, that's a user-space bug since tagged file offsets were never
> > supported. In this case it's not even a tag at bit 56 as per the arm64
> > tagged address ABI but rather down to bit 47. You could say that the
> > problem is caused by the C library (malloc()) or whoever created the
> > tagged vaddr and passed it to this function. It's not a kernel
> > regression as we've never supported it.
> >
> > Now, pagemap is a special case where the offset is usually not generated
> > as a classic file offset but rather derived by shifting a user virtual
> > address. I guess we can make a concession for pagemap (only) and allow
> > such offset with the tag at bit (56 - PAGE_SHIFT + 3).
> > "
> >
> > My test code is baed on [2]:
>
> Nit: s/baed/based/ (please search and replace all occurrences :) )

thanks, I will fix this and push v3



Miles
>
> [...]
>
> > ---
> > fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 8 ++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > index 217aa2705d5d..92b277388f05 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > @@ -1599,11 +1599,15 @@ static ssize_t pagemap_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> >
> > src = *ppos;
> > svpfn = src / PM_ENTRY_BYTES;
> > - start_vaddr = svpfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > end_vaddr = mm->task_size;
> >
> > /* watch out for wraparound */
> > - if (svpfn > mm->task_size >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> > + start_vaddr = end_vaddr;
> > + if (svpfn < (ULONG_MAX >> PAGE_SHIFT))
>
> It seems that 'svpfn' should be less-then-equal (<=) '(ULONG_MAX >>
> PAGE_SHIFT)'. Is there any specific reason why this is not the case?
>
> > + start_vaddr = untagged_addr(svpfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> > +
> > + /* Ensure the address is inside the task */
> > + if (start_vaddr > mm->task_size)
> > start_vaddr = end_vaddr;
> >
> > /*
> >
>
> Otherwise:
>
> Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
>