Re: [PATCH] pstore: Tidy up an error check

From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Wed Dec 02 2020 - 15:01:25 EST


On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 11:25:46AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 09:45:31AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The crypto_alloc_comp() function never returns NULL, it returns error
> > pointers on error.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I replied to an identical patch yesterday, actually:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202012011215.B9BF24A6D@keescook/
>
> Using IS_ERR_OR_NULL() is more robust, and this isn't fast path, so I'd
> prefer to keep it that way.
>

The NULL return doesn't make any sense though because crypto_alloc_comp()
isn't optional... When a function returns both error pointers and NULLs
then the NULL is special kind of success.

p = get_feature();

If "p" is an error pointer that means an error happened. If "p" is NULL
that means the feature is disabled in the .config or whatever. We can't
return a valid pointer because the feature doesn't exist but it's also
not an error so it doesn't return an error pointer. The code should
not print a warning, maybe an info level printk at most. Then the
driver should continue operating with the feature turned off.

Two of the callers for crypto_alloc_comp() check for error pointers and
NULL and three only check for error pointers. It's inconsistent.

regards,
dan carpenter