Re: [PATCH 16/18] i2c: i2c-core-base: Use the new i2c_acpi_dev_name() in i2c_set_dev_name()

[Dan Scally]

On 02/12/2020 09:35, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Dan, does this mail among other my replies reach you?
> It seems you answered to Laurent's mails and leaving mine ignored. Just
> wondering if our servers have an issue again...
Morning - I got it, sorry. I just read Laurent's first and then called
it a night
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 09:18:56PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:12:41PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:27PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
>>>> From: Dan Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> To make sure the new i2c_acpi_dev_name() always reflects the name of i2c
>>>> devices sourced from ACPI, use it in i2c_set_dev_name().
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> I'd squash this with 15/18, which would make it clear there's a memory
>>> leak :-)
>> ...
>>
>>>>  	if (adev) {
>>>> -		dev_set_name(&client->dev, "i2c-%s", acpi_dev_name(adev));
>>>> +		dev_set_name(&client->dev, i2c_acpi_dev_name(adev));
>>>>  		return;
>> But you split pattern used in i2c_dev_set_name().
>> What you need is to provide something like this
>>
>> #define I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT	"i2c-%s"
>>
>> const char *i2c_acpi_get_dev_name(...)
>> {
>> 	return kasprintf(..., I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT, ...);
>> }
>>
>> (Possible in the future if anybody needs
>>   const char *i2c_dev_get_name_by_bus_and_addr(int bus, unsigned short addr)
>> )
>>
>> And here
>>
>> -		dev_set_name(&client->dev, "i2c-%s", info->dev_name);
>> +		dev_set_name(&client->dev, I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT, info->dev_name);
>>
>> -		dev_set_name(&client->dev, "i2c-%s", acpi_dev_name(adev));
>> +		dev_set_name(&client->dev, I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT, acpi_dev_name(adev));
>>
Yeah ok, I like this approach much better, I'll switch to that.