Re: [PATCH 00/23] Rid W=1 warnings in MTD

[Miquel Raynal]

Hi Lee,

Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Fri, 6 Nov 2020 13:32:47
+0000:

> > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
> > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
> > niggly little warnings.
> > 
> > Lee Jones (23):
> >   mtd: mtdpart: Fix misdocumented function parameter 'mtd'
> >   mtd: devices: phram: File headers are not good candidates for
> >     kernel-doc
> >   mtd: nand: onenand: onenand_base: Fix expected kernel-doc formatting
> >   mtd: devices: docg3: Fix kernel-doc 'bad line' and 'excessive doc'
> >     issues
> >   mtd: mtdcore: Fix misspelled function parameter 'section'
> >   mtd: nand: onenand: onenand_bbt: Fix expected kernel-doc formatting
> >   mtd: spi-nor: controllers: hisi-sfc: Demote non-conformant kernel-doc
> >   mtd: ubi: build: Document 'ubi_num' in struct mtd_dev_param
> >   mtd: nand: spi: toshiba: Demote non-conformant kernel-doc header
> >   mtd: ubi: kapi: Correct documentation for 'ubi_leb_read_sg's 'sgl'
> >     parameter
> >   mtd: ubi: eba: Fix a couple of misdocumentation issues
> >   mtd: ubi: wl: Fix a couple of kernel-doc issues
> >   mtd: nand: raw: brcmnand: brcmnand: Demote non-conformant kernel-doc
> >     headers
> >   mtd: ubi: gluebi: Fix misnamed function parameter documentation
> >   mtd: nand: raw: diskonchip: Marking unused variables as
> >     __always_unused
> >   mtd: nand: raw: cafe_nand: Remove superfluous param doc and add
> >     another
> >   mtd: nand: raw: s3c2410: Add documentation for 2 missing struct
> >     members
> >   mtd: nand: raw: omap_elm: Finish half populated function header,
> >     demote empty ones
> >   mtd: nand: raw: omap2: Fix a bunch of kernel-doc misdemeanours
> >   mtd: nand: raw: sunxi_nand: Document 'sunxi_nfc's 'caps' member
> >   mtd: nand: raw: arasan-nand-controller: Document 'anfc_op's 'buf'
> >     member
> >   mtd: nand: onenand: onenand_base: Fix some kernel-doc misdemeanours
> >   mtd: devices: powernv_flash: Add function names to headers and fix
> >     'dev'  
> 
> May I ask; what is the plan for these patches please?
> 
> Do you plan on taking the ones that do not require re-work, rather
> than fixing up and re-submitting the whole set.  It would certainly
> save a lot of mailing list churn if that were the case.
> 
> Either way, let me know and I will abide by your decision.
> 

I would prefer receiving a v2 with all the patches if you don't mind.

Thanks,
Miquèl