Re: [PATCH -V2 1/2] mempolicy: Rename MPOL_F_MORON to MPOL_F_MOPRON

From: Huang, Ying
Date: Sun Nov 01 2020 - 22:13:05 EST


Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri 30-10-20 15:27:51, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > On Wed 28-10-20 10:34:10, Huang Ying wrote:
>> >> To follow code-of-conduct better.
>> >
>> > This is changing a user visible interface and any userspace which refers
>> > to the existing name will fail to compile unless I am missing something.
>>
>> Although these flags are put in uapi, I found these flags are actually
>> internal flags used in "flags" field of struct mempolicy, they are never
>> used as flags for any user space API. I guess they are placed in uapi
>> header file to guarantee they aren't conflict with MPOL_MODE_FLAGS.
>
> You are right. I have missed that. The comment in the header even explains
> that. Anyway the placement is rather unusual and I think that those
> flags do not belong there.
>
>> > Have you checked how many applications would be affected?
>>
>> Based on above analysis, I think there is no application that will be
>> affected.
>>
>> > Btw I find "follow CoC better" a very weak argument without further
>> > explanation.
>>
>> That is the only reason for the patch. If nobody thinks the change is
>> necessary, I can just drop the patch.
>
> Well, to be honest I do not see any problem with the naming.

This is a capitalized words and prefixed, so most people think it's OK.
And in PATCH 2/2, there's a newly added label,

mopron:

Which may become

moron:

some people think that we'd better to change it. And to make the wording
consistent, the constant is changed too.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying