Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI: dwc: Add support to handle prefetchable memory separately

From: Vidya Sagar
Date: Mon Oct 05 2020 - 08:19:54 EST




On 9/7/2020 10:40 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 10:05:06AM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:


On 18-Jun-20 12:26 AM, Vidya Sagar wrote:


On 02-Jun-20 10:37 PM, Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 11:9:38, Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In this patch series,
Patch-1
adds required infrastructure to deal with prefetchable memory region
information coming from 'ranges' property of the respective
device-tree node
separately from non-prefetchable memory region information.
Patch-2
Adds support to use ATU region-3 for establishing the mapping
between CPU
addresses and PCIe bus addresses.
It also changes the logic to determine whether mapping is
required or not by
checking both CPU address and PCIe bus address for both prefetchable and
non-prefetchable regions. If the addresses are same, then, it is
understood
that 1:1 mapping is in place and there is no need to setup ATU mapping
whereas if the addresses are not the same, then, there is a need
to setup ATU
mapping. This is certainly true for Tegra194 and what I heard
from our HW
engineers is that it should generally be true for any DWC based
implementation
also.
Hence, I request Synopsys folks (Jingoo Han & Gustavo Pimentel
??) to confirm
the same so that this particular patch won't cause any
regressions for other
DWC based platforms.

Hi Vidya,

Unfortunately due to the COVID-19 lockdown, I can't access my development
prototype setup to test your patch.
It might take some while until I get the possibility to get access to it
again.
Hi Gustavo,
Did you find time to check this?
Adding Kishon and Alan as well to take a look at this and verify on
their platforms if possible.
Hi Kishon and Alan, did you find time to verify this on your respective
platforms?

Yes please. I would like to merge this code, in preparation for that
to happen mind rebasing the series against my pci/dwc branch with
Rob's suggested changes implemented ?
Hi,
Apologies for the delay in reply. I was on leave and couldn't really look into it.
I pushed a new patch on top of your pci/dwc branch at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20201005121351.32516-1-vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx/

@Rob and @Lorenzo, please review it.
Since I changed the subject, I pushed it as a new patch and not as V2 of the previous patch set. I hope this is fine.

Thanks,
Vidya Sagar


Thanks a lot,
Lorenzo