Re: [PATCH 06/14] Fix CFLAGS for UBSAN_BOUNDS on Clang

From: Marco Elver
Date: Tue Sep 15 2020 - 14:44:43 EST


On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 14:01, George Popescu <georgepope@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:18:11PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 12:25, George Popescu <georgepope@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:13:14PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 05:27:42PM +0000, George-Aurelian Popescu wrote:
> > > > > From: George Popescu <georgepope@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > When the kernel is compiled with Clang, UBSAN_BOUNDS inserts a brk after
> > > > > the handler call, preventing it from printing any information processed
> > > > > inside the buffer.
> > > > > For Clang -fsanitize=bounds expands to -fsanitize=array-bounds and
> > > > > -fsanitize=local-bounds, and the latter adds a brk after the handler
> > > > > call
> > > >
> > > This would mean losing the local-bounds coverage. I tried to test it without
> > > local-bounds and with a locally defined array on the stack and it works fine
> > > (the handler is called and the error reported). For me it feels like
> > > --array-bounds and --local-bounds are triggered for the same type of
> > > undefined_behaviours but they are handling them different.
> >
> > Does -fno-sanitize-trap=bounds help?>
>
> I tried replacing it with:
> ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fno-sanitize-trap=bounds)
> CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=bounds)
> else
> CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=bounds)
> endif
>
> The code traps.

What's your config? Do you have CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP=y? If so, you have 2
options: honor UBSAN_TRAP and crash the kernel, or have a
'CFLAGS_REMOVE_... = -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error' for the files
where you can't deal with traps.

Thanks,
-- Marco