Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm: panel: add TDO tl070wsh30 panel driver

From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Mon Sep 07 2020 - 15:52:53 EST

Next message: Joe Perches: "[PATCH 5/4] drivers core: Convert class uses of sprintf to sysfs_emit"
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] fs: align IOCB_* flags with RWF_* flags"
In reply to: Neil Armstrong: "[PATCH v2 3/3] drm: panel: add TDO tl070wsh30 panel driver"
Next in thread: Neil Armstrong: "[PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: add TDO tl070wsh30 DSI panel bindings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Neil.

On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 01:10:27PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> This adds support for the TDO TL070WSH30 TFT-LCD panel module.
> The panel has a 1024×600 resolution and uses 24 bit RGB per pixel.
> It provides a MIPI DSI interface to the host, a built-in LED backlight
> and touch controller.

Despite a nicely written driver I noticed a few things that needs to be
addressed.

Sam
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig | 11 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-tdo-tl070wsh30.c | 256 +++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 268 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-tdo-tl070wsh30.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig
> index 8d97d07c5871..2d488a875b99 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig
> @@ -433,6 +433,17 @@ config DRM_PANEL_SONY_ACX565AKM
> Say Y here if you want to enable support for the Sony ACX565AKM
> 800x600 3.5" panel (found on the Nokia N900).
>
> +config DRM_PANEL_TDO_TL070WSH30
> + tristate "TDO TL070WSH30 DSI panel"
> + depends on OF
> + depends on DRM_MIPI_DSI
> + depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE
> + help
> + Say Y here if you want to enable support for TDO TL070WSH30 TFT-LCD
> + panel module. The panel has a 1024×600 resolution and uses
> + 24 bit RGB per pixel. It provides a MIPI DSI interface to
> + the host, a built-in LED backlight and touch controller.
> +
> config DRM_PANEL_TPO_TD028TTEC1
> tristate "Toppoly (TPO) TD028TTEC1 panel driver"
> depends on OF && SPI
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile
> index 15a4e7752951..35ee06a1b5c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SITRONIX_ST7703) += panel-sitronix-st7703.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SITRONIX_ST7789V) += panel-sitronix-st7789v.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SONY_ACX424AKP) += panel-sony-acx424akp.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SONY_ACX565AKM) += panel-sony-acx565akm.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_TDO_TL070WSH30) += panel-tdo-tl070wsh30.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_TPO_TD028TTEC1) += panel-tpo-td028ttec1.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_TPO_TD043MTEA1) += panel-tpo-td043mtea1.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_TPO_TPG110) += panel-tpo-tpg110.o
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-tdo-tl070wsh30.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-tdo-tl070wsh30.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c7a6c2c42c52
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-tdo-tl070wsh30.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 BayLibre, SAS
> + * Author: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> +
> +#include <video/mipi_display.h>
> +
> +#include <drm/drm_crtc.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_device.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_modes.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_panel.h>
> +
> +struct tdo_tl070wsh30_panel {
> + struct drm_panel base;
> + struct mipi_dsi_device *link;
> +
> + struct regulator *supply;
> + struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
> +
> + bool prepared;
> +};
> +
> +static inline
> +struct tdo_tl070wsh30_panel *to_tdo_tl070wsh30_panel(struct drm_panel *panel)
> +{
> + return container_of(panel, struct tdo_tl070wsh30_panel, base);
> +}

bikeshedding - but my preference is to order the functions:

prepare
enable
disable
unprepare

As this is the natural order they are used.
Feel free to ignore!

> +
> +static int tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
> +{
> + struct tdo_tl070wsh30_panel *tdo_tl070wsh30 = to_tdo_tl070wsh30_panel(panel);
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!tdo_tl070wsh30->prepared)
> + return 0;
> +
> + err = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off(tdo_tl070wsh30->link);
> + if (err < 0)
> + dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to set display off: %d\n", err);
> +
> + usleep_range(10000, 11000);
> +
> + err = mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode(tdo_tl070wsh30->link);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to enter sleep mode: %d\n", err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + usleep_range(10000, 11000);
> +
> + tdo_tl070wsh30->prepared = false;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
> +{
> + struct tdo_tl070wsh30_panel *tdo_tl070wsh30 = to_tdo_tl070wsh30_panel(panel);
> + int err;
> +
> + if (tdo_tl070wsh30->prepared)
> + return 0;
> +
> + err = mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode(tdo_tl070wsh30->link);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to exit sleep mode: %d\n", err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + msleep(200);
> +
> + err = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on(tdo_tl070wsh30->link);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to set display on: %d\n", err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + msleep(20);
> +
> + tdo_tl070wsh30->prepared = true;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct drm_display_mode default_mode = {
> + .clock = 47250,
> + .hdisplay = 1024,
> + .hsync_start = 1024 + 46,
> + .hsync_end = 1024 + 46 + 80,
> + .htotal = 1024 + 46 + 80 + 100,
> + .vdisplay = 600,
> + .vsync_start = 600 + 5,
> + .vsync_end = 600 + 5 + 5,
> + .vtotal = 600 + 5 + 5 + 20,
> + .flags = DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC | DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC,
> +};
> +
> +static int tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_get_modes(struct drm_panel *panel,
> + struct drm_connector *connector)
> +{
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode;
> +
> + mode = drm_mode_duplicate(connector->dev, &default_mode);
> + if (!mode) {
> + dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to add mode %ux%ux\n", default_mode.hdisplay,
> + default_mode.vdisplay);
Here we often print the refresh rate too.
If there is no need for the refresh rate than at least drop the extra
'x' at the end of the line.

> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + drm_mode_set_name(mode);
> +
> + drm_mode_probed_add(connector, mode);
> +
> + connector->display_info.width_mm = 154;
> + connector->display_info.height_mm = 85;
> + connector->display_info.bpc = 8;
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct drm_panel_funcs tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_funcs = {
> + .unprepare = tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_unprepare,
> + .prepare = tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_prepare,
> + .get_modes = tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_get_modes,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id tdo_tl070wsh30_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "tdo,tl070wsh30", },
> + { }
I often recommends
{ /* sentinel },

but thats just to be consistent with what I see in other drivers.

> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tdo_tl070wsh30_of_match);
> +
> +static int tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_add(struct tdo_tl070wsh30_panel *tdo_tl070wsh30)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &tdo_tl070wsh30->link->dev;
> + int err;
> +
> + tdo_tl070wsh30->supply = devm_regulator_get(dev, "power");
> + if (IS_ERR(tdo_tl070wsh30->supply))
> + return PTR_ERR(tdo_tl070wsh30->supply);
> +
> + tdo_tl070wsh30->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset",
> + GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (IS_ERR(tdo_tl070wsh30->reset_gpio)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(tdo_tl070wsh30->reset_gpio);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "failed to get reset gpio: %d\n", err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + drm_panel_init(&tdo_tl070wsh30->base, &tdo_tl070wsh30->link->dev,
> + &tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_funcs, DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DSI);
> +
> + err = drm_panel_of_backlight(&tdo_tl070wsh30->base);
> + if (err)
> + return err;

> +
> + err = regulator_enable(tdo_tl070wsh30->supply);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
> +
> + usleep_range(10000, 11000);
> +
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(tdo_tl070wsh30->reset_gpio, 1);
> +
> + usleep_range(10000, 11000);
> +
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(tdo_tl070wsh30->reset_gpio, 0);
> +
> + msleep(200);
> +

It is the job of the prepare function to turn on the panel,
and likewise the unprepare to turn off the panel.
Please move the code above to the prepare function.

> + drm_panel_add(&tdo_tl070wsh30->base);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_del(struct tdo_tl070wsh30_panel *tdo_tl070wsh30)
> +{
> + drm_panel_remove(&tdo_tl070wsh30->base);
> +}
This helper does not gain anything - call drm_panel_remove() direct.

> +
> +static int tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> +{
> + struct tdo_tl070wsh30_panel *tdo_tl070wsh30;
> + int err;
> +
> + dsi->lanes = 4;
> + dsi->format = MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB888;
> + dsi->mode_flags = MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO | MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST | MIPI_DSI_MODE_LPM;
> +
> + tdo_tl070wsh30 = devm_kzalloc(&dsi->dev, sizeof(*tdo_tl070wsh30),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tdo_tl070wsh30)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + mipi_dsi_set_drvdata(dsi, tdo_tl070wsh30);
> + tdo_tl070wsh30->link = dsi;
> +
> + err = tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_add(tdo_tl070wsh30);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
> +
> + return mipi_dsi_attach(dsi);
> +}
> +
> +static int tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_remove(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> +{
> + struct tdo_tl070wsh30_panel *tdo_tl070wsh30 = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
> + int err;
> +
> + err = drm_panel_unprepare(&tdo_tl070wsh30->base);
> + if (err < 0)
> + dev_err(&dsi->dev, "failed to unprepare panel: %d\n", err);
> +
> + err = drm_panel_disable(&tdo_tl070wsh30->base);
> + if (err < 0)
> + dev_err(&dsi->dev, "failed to disable panel: %d\n", err);
> +
In most panel drivers we just ignore the return results here.

> + err = mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
> + if (err < 0)
> + dev_err(&dsi->dev, "failed to detach from DSI host: %d\n", err);
> +
> + tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_del(tdo_tl070wsh30);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_shutdown(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> +{
> + struct tdo_tl070wsh30_panel *tdo_tl070wsh30 = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
> +
> + drm_panel_unprepare(&tdo_tl070wsh30->base);
> + drm_panel_disable(&tdo_tl070wsh30->base);
This is the wrong order. disable before unpreapre.

I am not sure what is right here - but I see some drivers that only have
the disable() + unprepare() in their shutdown() method and then the
remocal in their remove() function.
That makes sense with this split but I have not looked too deep into it.

> +}
> +
> +static struct mipi_dsi_driver tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "panel-tdo-tl070wsh30",
> + .of_match_table = tdo_tl070wsh30_of_match,
> + },
> + .probe = tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_probe,
> + .remove = tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_remove,
> + .shutdown = tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_shutdown,
> +};
> +module_mipi_dsi_driver(tdo_tl070wsh30_panel_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TDO TL070WSH30 panel driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> --
> 2.22.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Next message: Joe Perches: "[PATCH 5/4] drivers core: Convert class uses of sprintf to sysfs_emit"
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] fs: align IOCB_* flags with RWF_* flags"
In reply to: Neil Armstrong: "[PATCH v2 3/3] drm: panel: add TDO tl070wsh30 panel driver"
Next in thread: Neil Armstrong: "[PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: add TDO tl070wsh30 DSI panel bindings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]