[PATCH] seccomp: don't leave dangling ->notif if file allocation fails

From: Tycho Andersen
Date: Wed Sep 02 2020 - 10:53:31 EST


Christian and Kees both pointed out that this is a bit sloppy to open-code
both places, and Christian points out that we leave a dangling pointer to
->notif if file allocation fails. Since we check ->notif for null in order
to determine if it's ok to install a filter, this means people won't be
able to install a filter if the file allocation fails for some reason, even
if they subsequently should be able to.

To fix this, let's hoist this free+null into its own little helper and use
it.

Reported-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>
---
kernel/seccomp.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index bb0dd9ae699a..676d4af62103 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -1109,6 +1109,12 @@ static long seccomp_set_mode_strict(void)
}

#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
+static void seccomp_notify_free(struct seccomp_filter *filter)
+{
+ kfree(filter->notif);
+ filter->notif = NULL;
+}
+
static void seccomp_notify_detach(struct seccomp_filter *filter)
{
struct seccomp_knotif *knotif;
@@ -1138,8 +1144,7 @@ static void seccomp_notify_detach(struct seccomp_filter *filter)
complete(&knotif->ready);
}

- kfree(filter->notif);
- filter->notif = NULL;
+ seccomp_notify_free(filter);
mutex_unlock(&filter->notify_lock);
}

@@ -1494,7 +1499,7 @@ static struct file *init_listener(struct seccomp_filter *filter)

out_notif:
if (IS_ERR(ret))
- kfree(filter->notif);
+ seccomp_notify_free(filter);
out:
return ret;
}

base-commit: 7b6aa0bb62fd6fd50f2d14136136262d28fb2dfe
--
2.25.1