Re: Kernel panic : Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address - dead address between user and kernel address ranges

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Thu Aug 27 2020 - 06:12:42 EST


On 27-08-20, 11:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > [ 3.680477] dev_pm_opp_put_clkname+0x30/0x58
> > > [ 3.683431] sdhci_msm_probe+0x284/0x9a0
>
> dev_pm_opp_put_clkname() is part of the error handling in the
> probe function, so I would deduct there are two problems:
>
> - something failed during the probe and the driver is trying
> to unwind
> - the error handling it self is buggy and tries to undo something
> again that has already been undone.

Right.

> This points to Viresh's
> d05a7238fe1c mmc: sdhci-msm: Unconditionally call dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table()

I completely forgot that Ulf already pushed this patch and I was
wondering on which of the OPP core changes I wrote have done this :(

> Most likely this is not the entire problem but it uncovered a preexisting
> bug.

I think this is.

Naresh: Can you please test with this diff ?

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
index b7e47107a31a..401839a97b57 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
@@ -2286,7 +2286,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(&pdev->dev);
if (ret != -ENODEV) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid OPP table in Device tree\n");
- goto opp_cleanup;
+ goto opp_put_clkname;
}

/* Vote for maximum clock rate for maximum performance */
@@ -2451,6 +2451,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
msm_host->bulk_clks);
opp_cleanup:
dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(&pdev->dev);
+opp_put_clkname:
dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(msm_host->opp_table);
bus_clk_disable:
if (!IS_ERR(msm_host->bus_clk))

--
viresh