Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] opp: Reduce code duplication in _set_required_opps()

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Mon Aug 24 2020 - 07:19:12 EST


On 30-07-20, 10:01, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> Move call to dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state() to a separate
> function so we can avoid duplicating the code for the single and
> multiple genpd case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/opp/core.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
> index 9d7fb45b1786..f7a476b55069 100644
> --- a/drivers/opp/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
> @@ -781,6 +781,21 @@ static int _set_opp_custom(const struct opp_table *opp_table,
> return opp_table->set_opp(data);
> }
>
> +static int _set_required_opp(struct device *dev, struct device *pd_dev,
> + struct dev_pm_opp *opp, int i)
> +{
> + unsigned int pstate = likely(opp) ? opp->required_opps[i]->pstate : 0;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(pd_dev, pstate);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set performance rate of %s: %d (%d)\n",
> + dev_name(pd_dev), pstate, ret);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /* This is only called for PM domain for now */
> static int _set_required_opps(struct device *dev,
> struct opp_table *opp_table,
> @@ -788,22 +803,15 @@ static int _set_required_opps(struct device *dev,
> {
> struct opp_table **required_opp_tables = opp_table->required_opp_tables;
> struct device **genpd_virt_devs = opp_table->genpd_virt_devs;
> - unsigned int pstate;
> + struct device *pd_dev;
> int i, ret = 0;
>
> if (!required_opp_tables)
> return 0;
>
> /* Single genpd case */
> - if (!genpd_virt_devs) {
> - pstate = likely(opp) ? opp->required_opps[0]->pstate : 0;
> - ret = dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(dev, pstate);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to set performance state of %s: %d (%d)\n",
> - dev_name(dev), pstate, ret);
> - }
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (!genpd_virt_devs)
> + return _set_required_opp(dev, dev, opp, 0);
>
> /* Multiple genpd case */
>
> @@ -814,17 +822,11 @@ static int _set_required_opps(struct device *dev,
> mutex_lock(&opp_table->genpd_virt_dev_lock);
>
> for (i = 0; i < opp_table->required_opp_count; i++) {
> - pstate = likely(opp) ? opp->required_opps[i]->pstate : 0;
> -
> - if (!genpd_virt_devs[i])
> - continue;

Don't we need this check anymore ?

> + pd_dev = genpd_virt_devs[i];
>
> - ret = dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(genpd_virt_devs[i], pstate);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to set performance rate of %s: %d (%d)\n",
> - dev_name(genpd_virt_devs[i]), pstate, ret);
> + ret = _set_required_opp(dev, pd_dev, opp, i);
> + if (ret)
> break;
> - }
> }
> mutex_unlock(&opp_table->genpd_virt_dev_lock);
>
> --
> 2.27.0

--
viresh